Nonclinality of Molecular Variation Implicates Selection in Maintaining a Morphological Cline of Drosophila melanogaster

Corresponding author: Linda Partridge, Department of Biology, Galton Laboratory, Wolfson House, University College, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom., ucbhlop{at}ucl.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: D. CHARLESWORTH

One general approach for assessing whether phenotypic variation is due to selection is to test its correlation with presumably neutral molecular variation. Neutral variation is determined by population history, the most likely alternative explanation of spatial genetic structure, whereas phenotypic variation may be influenced by the spatial pattern of selection pressure. Several methods for comparing the spatial apportionment of molecular and morphological variation have been used. Here, we present an analysis of variance framework that compares the magnitudes of latitudinal effects for molecular and morphological variation along a body size cline in Australian Drosophila populations. Explicit incorporation of the relevant environmental gradient can result in a simple and powerful test of selection. For the Australian cline, our analysis provides strong internal evidence that the cline is due to selection.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. L. Turner, M. T. Levine, M. L. Eckert, and D. J. Begun Genomic Analysis of Adaptive Differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 455 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. V. Lia, V. A. Confalonieri, and L. Poggio B Chromosome Polymorphism in Maize Landraces: Adaptive vs. Demographic Hypothesis of Clinal Variation Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 895 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kennington, A. A. Hoffmann, and L. Partridge Mapping Regions Within Cosmopolitan Inversion In(3R)Payne Associated With Natural Variation in Body Size in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 549 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Vasemagi The Adaptive Hypothesis of Clinal Variation Revisited: Single-Locus Clines as a Result of Spatially Restricted Gene Flow Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2411 - 2414. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kennington, L. Partridge, and A. A. Hoffmann Patterns of Diversity and Linkage Disequilibrium Within the Cosmopolitan Inversion In(3R)Payne in Drosophila melanogaster Are Indicative of Coadaptation Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1655 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Moehring, J. Li, M. D. Schug, S. G. Smith, M. deAngelis, T. F. C. Mackay, and J. A. Coyne Quantitative Trait Loci for Sexual Isolation Between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1265 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kennington, J. Gockel, and L. Partridge Testing for Asymmetrical Gene Flow in a Drosophila melanogaster Body-Size Cline Genetics, October 1, 2003; 165(2): 667 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]