Genetics, Vol. 157, 1639-1648, April 2001, Copyright © 2001

Transgenic Analysis of the Smad Family of TGF-ß Signal Transducers in Drosophila melanogaster Suggests New Roles and New Interactions Between Family Members

Raymond M. Marqueza, Matthew A. Singerb, Norma T. Takaesua, W. Ross Waldripa, Yevgenya Kraytsbergb, and Stuart J. Newfelda,c
a Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287,
b The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
c Graduate Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287

Corresponding author: Stuart J. Newfeld, Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1501., newfeld{at}asu.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: S. YOKOYAMA

Smad signal transducers are required for transforming growth factor-ß-mediated developmental events in many organisms including humans. However, the roles of individual human Smad genes (hSmads) in development are largely unknown. Our hypothesis is that an hSmad performs developmental roles analogous to those of the most similar Drosophila Smad gene (dSmad). We expressed six hSmad and four dSmad transgenes in Drosophila melanogaster using the Gal4/UAS system and compared their phenotypes. Phylogenetically related human and Drosophila Smads induced similar phenotypes supporting the hypothesis. In contrast, two nearly identical hSmads generated distinct phenotypes. When expressed in wing imaginal disks, hSmad2 induced oversize wings while hSmad3 induced cell death. This observation suggests that a very small number of amino acid differences, between Smads in the same species, confer distinct developmental roles. Our observations also suggest new roles for the dSmads, Med and Dad, in dActivin signaling and potential interactions between these family members. Overall, the study demonstrates that transgenic methods in Drosophila can provide new information about non-Drosophila members of developmentally important multigene families.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
J. Batut, B. Schmierer, J. Cao, L. A. Raftery, C. S. Hill, and M. Howell
Two highly related regulatory subunits of PP2A exert opposite effects on TGF-{beta}/Activin/Nodal signalling
Development, September 1, 2008; 135(17): 2927 - 2937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
Y. A. Zeng, M. Rahnama, S. Wang, W. Sosu-Sedzorme, and E. M. Verheyen
Drosophila Nemo antagonizes BMP signaling by phosphorylation of Mad and inhibition of its nuclear accumulation
Development, June 1, 2007; 134(11): 2061 - 2071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
N. T. Takaesu, C. Hyman-Walsh, Y. Ye, R. G. Wisotzkey, M. J. Stinchfield, M. B. O'Connor, D. Wotton, and S. J. Newfeld
dSno Facilitates Baboon Signaling in the Drosophila Brain by Switching the Affinity of Medea Away From Mad and Toward dSmad2
Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1299 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
C. Molnar, A. Lopez-Varea, R. Hernandez, and J. F. de Celis
A Gain-of-Function Screen Identifying Genes Required for Vein Formation in the Drosophila melanogaster Wing
Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1635 - 1659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
S. E. Bondos, X.-X. Tan, and K. S. Matthews
Physical and Genetic Interactions Link Hox Function with Diverse Transcription Factors and Cell Signaling Proteins
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, May 1, 2006; 5(5): 824 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genes Dev.Home page
J. Massague, J. Seoane, and D. Wotton
Smad transcription factors
Genes & Dev., December 1, 2005; 19(23): 2783 - 2810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
N. T. Takaesu, E. Herbig, D. Zhitomersky, M. B. O'Connor, and S. J. Newfeld
DNA-binding domain mutations in SMAD genes yield dominant-negative proteins or a neomorphic protein that can activate WG target genes in Drosophila
Development, November 1, 2005; 132(21): 4883 - 4894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
M. Muzzopappa and P. Wappner
Multiple roles of the F-box protein Slimb in Drosophila egg chamber development
Development, June 1, 2005; 132(11): 2561 - 2571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Furumatsu, M. Tsuda, N. Taniguchi, Y. Tajima, and H. Asahara
Smad3 Induces Chondrogenesis through the Activation of SOX9 via CREB-binding Protein/p300 Recruitment
J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 8343 - 8350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
Y.-H. Koh, K. Rehfeld, and B. Ganetzky
A Drosophila model of early onset torsion dystonia suggests impairment in TGF-{beta} signaling
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 15, 2004; 13(18): 2019 - 2030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. A. Hyman, L. Bartholin, S. J. Newfeld, and D. Wotton
Drosophila TGIF Proteins Are Transcriptional Activators
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2003; 23(24): 9262 - 9274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
S. J. Newfeld and N. T. Takaesu
An Analysis Using the hobo Genetic System Reveals That Combinatorial Signaling by the Dpp and Wg Pathways Regulates dpp Expression in Leading Edge Cells of the Dorsal Ectoderm in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, June 1, 2002; 161(2): 685 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Kusanagi, M. Kawabata, H. K. Mishima, and K. Miyazono
alpha -Helix 2 in the Amino-terminal Mad Homology 1 Domain Is Responsible for Specific DNA Binding of Smad3
J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2001; 276(30): 28155 - 28163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]