Genetics, Vol. 157, 1299-1305, March 2001, Copyright © 2001

Integration of the Aedes aegypti Mosquito Genetic Linkage and Physical Maps

S. E. Browna, D. W. Seversonb, L. A. Smithb, and D. L. Knudsona
a Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, College of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
b Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Corresponding author: D. L. Knudson, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, College of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523., dennis.knudson{at}colostate.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: G. B. GOLDING

Two approaches were used to correlate the Aedes aegypti genetic linkage map to the physical map. STS markers were developed for previously mapped RFLP-based genetic markers so that large genomic clones from cosmid libraries could be found and placed to the metaphase chromosome physical maps using standard FISH methods. Eight cosmids were identified that contained eight RFLP marker sequences, and these cosmids were located on the metaphase chromosomes. Twenty-one cDNAs were mapped directly to metaphase chromosomes using a FISH amplification procedure. The chromosome numbering schemes of the genetic linkage and physical maps corresponded directly and the orientations of the genetic linkage maps for chromosomes 2 and 3 were inverted relative to the physical maps. While the chromosome 2 linkage map represented essentially 100% of chromosome 2, ~65% of the chromosome 1 linkage map mapped to only 36% of the short p-arm and 83% of the chromosome 3 physical map contained the complete genetic linkage map. Since the genetic linkage map is a RFLP cDNA-based map, these data also provide a minimal estimate for the size of the euchromatic regions. The implications of these findings on positional cloning in A. aegypti are discussed.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
D. E. Brackney, B. D. Foy, and K. E. Olson
The Effects of Midgut Serine Proteases on Dengue Virus Type 2 Infectivity of Aedes aegypti
Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 267 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
K. J. Maragathavally, J. M. Kaminski, and C. J. Coates
Chimeric Mos1 and piggyBac transposases result in site-directed integration
FASEB J, September 1, 2006; 20(11): 1880 - 1882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. E. Bennett, D. Flick, K. H. Fleming, R. Jochim, B. J. Beaty, and W. C. Black IV
Quantitative Trait Loci That Control Dengue-2 Virus Dissemination in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti
Genetics, May 1, 2005; 170(1): 185 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
D. W. Severson, B. deBruyn, D. D. Lovin, S. E. Brown, D. L. Knudson, and I. Morlais
Comparative Genome Analysis of the Yellow Fever Mosquito Aedes aegypti with Drosophila melanogaster and the Malaria Vector Mosquito Anopheles gambiae
J. Hered., March 1, 2004; 95(2): 103 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]