Whole-Genome Effects of Ethyl Methanesulfonate-Induced Mutation on Nine Quantitative Traits in Outbred Drosophila melanogaster

Corresponding author: Hsiao-Pei Yang, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Corson Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853., hy31{at}cornell.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: K. GOLIC

We induced mutations in Drosophila melanogaster males by treating them with 21.2 mM ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). Nine quantitative traits (developmental time, viability, fecundity, longevity, metabolic rate, motility, body weight, and abdominal and sternopleural bristle numbers) were measured in outbred heterozygous F₃ (viability) or F₂ (all other traits) offspring from the treated males. The mean values of the first four traits, which are all directly related to the life history, were substantially affected by EMS mutagenesis: the developmental time increased while viability, fecundity, and longevity declined. In contrast, the mean values of the other five traits were not significantly affected. Rates of recessive X-linked lethals and of recessive mutations at several loci affecting eye color imply that our EMS treatment was equivalent to 100 generations of spontaneous mutation. If so, our data imply that one generation of spontaneous mutation increases the developmental time by 0.09% at 20° and by 0.04% at 25°, and reduces viability under harsh conditions, fecundity, and longevity by 1.35, 0.21, and 0.08%, respectively. Comparison of flies with none, one, and two grandfathers (or greatgrandfathers, in the case of viability) treated with EMS did not reveal any significant epistasis among the induced mutations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Jasnos, K. Tomala, D. Paczesniak, and R. Korona Interactions Between Stressful Environment and Gene Deletions Alleviate the Expected Average Loss of Fitness in Yeast Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2105 - 2111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Roux, C. Camilleri, S. Giancola, D. Brunel, and X. Reboud Epistatic Interactions Among Herbicide Resistances in Arabidopsis thaliana: The Fitness Cost of Multiresistance Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1277 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-X. Fu and H. Huai Estimating Mutation Rate: How to Count Mutations? Genetics, June 1, 2003; 164(2): 797 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. B. R. Azevedo, P. D. Keightley, C. Lauren-Maatta, L. L. Vassilieva, M. Lynch, and A. M. Leroi Spontaneous Mutational Variation for Body Size in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, October 1, 2002; 162(2): 755 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Wloch, K. Szafraniec, R. H. Borts, and R. Korona Direct Estimate of the Mutation Rate and the Distribution of Fitness Effects in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, October 1, 2001; 159(2): 441 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]