Genetics, Vol. 157, 1077-1087, March 2001, Copyright © 2001

Two Types of Recombination Hotspots in Bacteriophage T4: One Requires DNA Damage and a Replication Origin and the Other Does Not

Phuong L. Doana, Karyn Goudie Belangera, and Kenneth N. Kreuzera
a Departments of Microbiology and Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Corresponding author: Kenneth N. Kreuzer, Department of Microbiology, Box 3020, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710-3020., kenneth.kreuzer{at}duke.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. MAURER

Recombination hotspots have previously been discovered in bacteriophage T4 by two different approaches, marker rescue recombination from heavily damaged phage genomes and recombination during co-infection by two undamaged phage genomes. The phage replication origin ori(34) is located in a region that has a hotspot in both assays. To determine the relationship between the origin and the two kinds of hotspots, we generated phage carrying point mutations that should inactivate ori(34) but not affect the gene 34 reading frame (within which ori(34) is located). The mutations eliminated the function of the origin, as judged by both autonomous replication of plasmids during T4 infection and two-dimensional gel analysis of phage genomic replication intermediates. As expected from past studies, the ori(34) mutations also eliminated the hotspot for marker rescue recombination from UV-irradiated genomes. However, the origin mutations had no effect on the recombination hotspot that is observed with co-infecting undamaged phage genomes, demonstrating that some DNA sequence other than the origin is responsible for inflated recombination between undamaged genomes. The hotspots for marker rescue recombination may result from a replication fork restart process that acts upon origin-initiated replication forks that become blocked at nearby DNA damage. The two-dimensional gel analysis also revealed phage T4 replication intermediates not previously detected by this method, including origin theta forms.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. T. Long and K. N. Kreuzer
Regression supports two mechanisms of fork processing in phage T4
PNAS, May 13, 2008; 105(19): 6852 - 6857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. C. Dudas and K. N. Kreuzer
Bacteriophage T4 Helicase Loader Protein gp59 Functions as Gatekeeper in Origin-dependent Replication in Vivo
J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21561 - 21569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
E. S. Miller, E. Kutter, G. Mosig, F. Arisaka, T. Kunisawa, and W. Ruger
Bacteriophage T4 Genome
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2003; 67(1): 86 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. A. Stohr and K. N. Kreuzer
Coordination of DNA Ends During Double-Strand-Break Repair in Bacteriophage T4
Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1019 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. W. George, B. A. Stohr, D. J. Tomso, and K. N. Kreuzer
The tight linkage between DNA replication and double-strand break repair in bacteriophage T4
PNAS, July 17, 2001; 98(15): 8290 - 8297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]