Genetics, Vol. 156, 2093-2107, December 2000, Copyright © 2000

Detecting the Undetected: Estimating the Total Number of Loci Underlying a Quantitative Trait

Sarah P. Ottoa and Corbin D. Jonesb
a Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
b Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627

Corresponding author: Sarah P. Otto, Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 124., otto{at}zoology.ubc.ca (E-mail)

Communicating editor: J. B. WALSH

Recent studies have begun to reveal the genes underlying quantitative trait differences between closely related populations. Not all quantitative trait loci (QTL) are, however, equally likely to be detected. QTL studies involve a limited number of crosses, individuals, and genetic markers and, as a result, often have little power to detect genetic factors of small to moderate effects. In this article, we develop an estimator for the total number of fixed genetic differences between two parental lines. Like the Castle-Wright estimator, which is based on the observed segregation variance in classical crossbreeding experiments, our QTL-based estimator requires that a distribution be specified for the expected effect sizes of the underlying loci. We use this expected distribution and the observed mean and minimum effect size of the detected QTL in a likelihood model to estimate the total number of loci underlying the trait difference. We then test the QTL-based estimator and the Castle-Wright estimator in Monte Carlo simulations. When the assumptions of the simulations match those of the model, both estimators perform well on average. The 95% confidence limits of the Castle-Wright estimator, however, often excluded the true number of underlying loci, while the confidence limits for the QTL-based estimator typically included the true value ~95% of the time. Furthermore, we found that the QTL-based estimator was less sensitive to dominance and to allelic effects of opposite sign than the Castle-Wright estimator. We therefore suggest that the QTL-based estimator be used to assess how many loci may have been missed in QTL studies.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J HeredHome page
B. Gutierrez-Gil, N. Ball, D. Burton, M. Haskell, J. L. Williams, and P. Wiener
Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Cattle Temperament
J. Hered., November 1, 2008; 99(6): 629 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. Genissel, L. M. McIntyre, M. L. Wayne, and S. V. Nuzhdin
Cis and Trans Regulatory Effects Contribute to Natural Variation in Transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 101 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. J. Chamberlain, H. C. McPartlan, and M. E. Goddard
The Number of Loci That Affect Milk Production Traits in Dairy Cattle
Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 1117 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. L. Burch, S. Guyader, D. Samarov, and H. Shen
Experimental Estimate of the Abundance and Effects of Nearly Neutral Mutations in the RNA Virus {phi}6
Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 467 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. D. H. Barrett, L. K. M'Gonigle, and S. P. Otto
The Distribution of Beneficial Mutant Effects Under Strong Selection
Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2071 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Poon, B. H. Davis, and L. Chao
The Coupon Collector and the Suppressor Mutation: Estimating the Number of Compensatory Mutations by Maximum Likelihood
Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1323 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. B. Brem and L. Kruglyak
The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast
PNAS, February 1, 2005; 102(5): 1572 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X.-S. Zhang and W. G. Hill
Predictions of Patterns of Response to Artificial Selection in Lines Derived From Natural Populations
Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 411 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. O. Wilke
The Speed of Adaptation in Large Asexual Populations
Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 2045 - 2053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill
Redistribution of Gene Frequency and Changes of Genetic Variation Following a Bottleneck in Population Size
Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1475 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. Mihaljevic, H. F. Utz, and A. E. Melchinger
Congruency of Quantitative Trait Loci Detected for Agronomic Traits in Testcrosses of Five Populations of European Maize
Crop Sci., January 1, 2004; 44(1): 114 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. K. Griswold and M. C. Whitlock
The Genetics of Adaptation: The Roles of Pleiotropy, Stabilizing Selection and Drift in Shaping the Distribution of Bidirectional Fixed Mutational Effects
Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 2181 - 2192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. Xu
Theoretical Basis of the Beavis Effect
Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 2259 - 2268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
R. C. Albertson, J. T. Streelman, and T. D. Kocher
Genetic Basis of Adaptive Shape Differences in the Cichlid Head
J. Hered., July 1, 2003; 94(4): 291 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. A. Orr
The Distribution of Fitness Effects Among Beneficial Mutations
Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1519 - 1526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. Xu
Estimating Polygenic Effects Using Markers of the Entire Genome
Genetics, February 1, 2003; 163(2): 789 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. A. F. Noor, A. L. Cunningham, and J. C. Larkin
Consequences of Recombination Rate Variation on Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Studies: Simulations Based on the Drosophila melanogaster Genome
Genetics, October 1, 2001; 159(2): 581 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]