Mutation-Selection Balance, Dominance and the Maintenance of Sex

Corresponding author: J. R. Chasnov

Communicating editor: M. J. SIMMONS

A leading hypothesis for the evolutionary function of sex postulates that sex is an adaptation that purges deleterious mutations from the genome, thereby increasing the equilibrium mean fitness of a sexual population relative to its asexual competitor. This hypothesis requires two necessary conditions: first, the mutation rate per genome must be of order one, and, second, multiple mutations within a genome must act with positive epistasis, that is, two or more mutations of different genes must be more harmful together than if they acted independently. Here, by reconsidering the theory of mutation-selection balance at a single diploid gene locus, we demonstrate a significant advantage of sex due to nearly recessive mutations provided the mutation rate per genome is of order one. The assumption of positive epistasis is unnecessary, and multiple mutations may be assumed to act independently.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. B. Mark Welch, J. L. Mark Welch, and M. Meselson Evidence for degenerate tetraploidy in bdelloid rotifers PNAS, April 1, 2008; 105(13): 5145 - 5149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Haag and D. Roze Genetic Load in Sexual and Asexual Diploids: Segregation, Dominance and Genetic Drift Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1663 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Hadany and S. P. Otto The Evolution of Condition-Dependent Sex in the Face of High Costs Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1713 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero The Effect of Antagonistic Pleiotropy on the Estimation of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 2097 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Phadnis and J. D. Fry Widespread Correlations Between Dominance and Homozygous Effects of Mutations: Implications for Theories of Dominance Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 385 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero Analysis of the Estimators of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 1053 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill Influence of Dominance, Leptokurtosis and Pleiotropy of Deleterious Mutations on Quantitative Genetic Variation at Mutation-Selection Balance Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 597 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Otto The Advantages of Segregation and the Evolution of Sex Genetics, July 1, 2003; 164(3): 1099 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Dolgin and S. P. Otto Segregation and the Evolution of Sex Under Overdominant Selection Genetics, July 1, 2003; 164(3): 1119 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Agrawal and J. R. Chasnov Recessive Mutations and the Maintenance of Sex in Structured Populations Genetics, June 1, 2001; 158(2): 913 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]