Statistical Models for Estimating the Genetic Basis of Repeated Measures and Other Function-Valued Traits

Corresponding author: Scott D. Pletcher, Department of Biology, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, University College, London NW1 2HE, England., s.pletcher{at}ucl.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: C. HALEY

The genetic analysis of characters that are best considered as functions of some independent and continuous variable, such as age, can be a complicated matter, and a simple and efficient procedure is desirable. Three methods are common in the literature: random regression, orthogonal polynomial approximation, and character process models. The goals of this article are (i) to clarify the relationships between these methods; (ii) to develop a general extension of the character process model that relaxes correlation stationarity, its most stringent assumption; and (iii) to compare and contrast the techniques and evaluate their performance across a range of actual and simulated data. We find that the character process model, as described in 1999 by Pletcher and Geyer, is the most successful method of analysis for the range of data examined in this study. It provides a reasonable description of a wide range of different covariance structures, and it results in the best models for actual data. Our analysis suggests genetic variance for Drosophila mortality declines with age, while genetic variance is constant at all ages for reproductive output. For growth in beef cattle, however, genetic variance increases linearly from birth, and genetic correlations are high across all observed ages.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. E. Bauman, J. S. Sinsheimer, E. M. Sobel, and K. Lange Mixed Effects Models for Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping With Inbred Strains Genetics, November 1, 2008; 180(3): 1743 - 1761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. G. Riley, S. W. Coleman, C. C. Chase Jr., T. A. Olson, and A. C. Hammond Genetic parameters for body weight, hip height, and the ratio of weight to hip height from random regression analyses of Brahman feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 42 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Macgregor, S. A. Knott, I. White, and P. M. Visscher Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Longitudinal Quantitative Trait Data in Complex Pedigrees Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1365 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Meyer and M. Kirkpatrick Up hill, down dale: quantitative genetics of curvaceous traits Phil Trans R Soc B, July 29, 2005; 360(1459): 1443 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kirkpatrick and K. Meyer Direct Estimation of Genetic Principal Components: Simplified Analysis of Complex Phenotypes Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 2295 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Zhao, J. Zhu, M. Gallo-Meagher, and R. Wu A Unified Statistical Model for Functional Mapping of Environment-Dependent Genetic Expression and Genotype x Environment Interactions for Ontogenetic Development Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1751 - 1762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Jaffrezic, R. Thompson, and S. D. Pletcher Multivariate Character Process Models for the Analysis of Two or More Correlated Function-Valued Traits Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 477 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-X. Ma, G. Casella, and R. Wu Functional Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci Underlying the Character Process: A Theoretical Framework Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1751 - 1762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]