help button home button Genetics Infection and Immunity
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krishnan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krishnan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, F.
Genetics, Vol. 156, 489-500, October 2000, Copyright © 2000

Saccharomyces cerevisiae BUB2 Prevents Mitotic Exit in Response to Both Spindle and Kinetochore Damage

Rajesh Krishnana, Faith Pangilinana, Catherine Leea, and Forrest Spencera
a Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205

Corresponding author: Forrest Spencer, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave./Ross 850, Baltimore, MD 21205., fspencer{at}jhmi.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: P. RUSSELL

The spindle assembly checkpoint-mediated mitotic arrest depends on proteins that signal the presence of one or more unattached kinetochores and prevents the onset of anaphase in the presence of kinetochore or spindle damage. In the presence of either damage, bub2 cells initiate a preanaphase delay but do not maintain it. Inappropriate sister chromatid separation in nocodazole-treated bub2 cells is prevented when mitotic exit is blocked using a conditional tem1c mutant, indicating that the preanaphase failure in bub2 cells is a consequence of events downstream of TEM1 in the mitotic exit pathway. Using a conditional bub2tsd mutant, we demonstrate that the continuous presence of Bub2 protein is required for maintaining spindle damage-induced arrest. BUB2 is not required to maintain a DNA damage checkpoint arrest, revealing a specificity for spindle assembly checkpoint function. In a yeast two-hybrid assay and in vitro, Bub2 protein interacts with the septin protein Cdc3, which is essential for cytokinesis. These data support the view that the spindle assembly checkpoint encompasses regulation of distinct mitotic steps, including a MAD2-directed block to anaphase initiation and a BUB2-directed block to TEM1-dependent exit.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. J. Krogan, K. Baetz, M.-C. Keogh, N. Datta, C. Sawa, T. C. Y. Kwok, N. J. Thompson, M. G. Davey, J. Pootoolal, T. R. Hughes, et al.
Regulation of chromosome stability by the histone H2A variant Htz1, the Swr1 chromatin remodeling complex, and the histone acetyltransferase NuA4
PNAS, September 14, 2004; 101(37): 13513 - 13518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
V. J. Cid, J. Jimenez, M. Molina, M. Sanchez, C. Nombela, and J. W. Thorner
Orchestrating the cell cycle in yeast: sequential localization of key mitotic regulators at the spindle pole and the bud neck
Microbiology, September 1, 2002; 148(9): 2647 - 2659.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
C. D. Warren, D. M. Brady, R. C. Johnston, J. S. Hanna, K. G. Hardwick, and F. A. Spencer
Distinct Chromosome Segregation Roles for Spindle Checkpoint Proteins
Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2002; 13(9): 3029 - 3041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. H. Jones, X. He, T. H. Giddings, and M. Winey
Yeast Dam1p has a role at the kinetochore in assembly of the mitotic spindle
PNAS, October 31, 2001; (2001) 241417098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. H. Jones, X. He, T. H. Giddings, and M. Winey
Yeast Dam1p has a role at the kinetochore in assembly of the mitotic spindle
PNAS, November 20, 2001; 98(24): 13675 - 13680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Genetics Society of America.