- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Kuhner, M. K.
- Articles by Felsenstein, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Kuhner, M. K.
- Articles by Felsenstein, J.
Usefulness of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Data for Estimating Population Parameters
Mary K. Kuhnera, Peter Beerlia, Jon Yamatoa, and Joseph Felsensteinaa Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7360
Corresponding author: Mary K. Kuhner, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Box 357360, Seattle, WA 98195-7360., mkkuhner{at}genetics.washington.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: G. A. CHURCHILL
= 4Neµ (the scaled product of effective population size and per-site mutation rate), which is related to the branch lengths of the reconstructed genealogy. With infinite amounts of data, ML models using SNP data are expected to produce consistent estimates of
. With finite amounts of data the estimates are accurate when
is high, but tend to be biased upward when
is low. If recombination is present and not allowed for in the analysis, the results are additionally biased upward, but this effect can be removed by incorporating recombination into the analysis. SNPs defined as sites that are polymorphic in the actual sample under consideration (sample SNPs) are somewhat more accurate for estimation of
than SNPs defined by their polymorphism in a panel chosen from the same population (panel SNPs). Misrepresenting panel SNPs as sample SNPs leads to large errors in the maximum likelihood estimate of
. Researchers collecting SNPs should collect and preserve information about the method of ascertainment so that the data can be accurately analyzed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. Ryynanen, A. Tonteri, A. Vasemagi, and C. R. Primmer A Comparison of Biallelic Markers and Microsatellites for the Estimation of Population and Conservation Genetic Parameters in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) J. Hered., November 5, 2007; (2007) esm093v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Knudsen and M. M. Miyamoto Incorporating Experimental Design and Error Into Coalescent/Mutation Models of Population History Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2335 - 2342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. Rosenblum and J. Novembre Ascertainment Bias in Spatially Structured Populations: A Case Study in the Eastern Fence Lizard J. Hered., July 4, 2007; (2007) esm031v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pariset, I. Cappuccio, P. Ajmone-Marsan, M. Bruford, S. Dunner, O. Cortes, G. Erhardt, E.-M. Prinzenberg, K. Gutscher, S. Joost, et al. Characterization of 37 Breed-Specific Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Sheep J. Hered., September 1, 2006; 97(5): 531 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Kuhner LAMARC 2.0: maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters Bioinformatics, March 15, 2006; 22(6): 768 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Clark, M. J. Hubisz, C. D. Bustamante, S. H. Williamson, and R. Nielsen Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphism Genome Res., November 1, 2005; 15(11): 1496 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nielsen, M. J. Hubisz, and A. G. Clark Reconstituting the Frequency Spectrum of Ascertained Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Data Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 2373 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Adams and R. R. Hudson Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Demographic Parameters Using the Frequency Spectrum of Unlinked Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1699 - 1712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Polanski and M. Kimmel New Explicit Expressions for Relative Frequencies of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms With Application to Statistical Inference on Population Growth Genetics, September 1, 2003; 165(1): 427 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. Nicod and C. R. Largiader SNPs by AFLP (SBA): a rapid SNP isolation strategy for non-model organisms Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2003; 31(5): e19 - e19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Akey, K. Zhang, M. Xiong, and L. Jin The Effect of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Identification Strategies on Estimates of Linkage Disequilibrium Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2003; 20(2): 232 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Akey, G. Zhang, K. Zhang, L. Jin, and M. D. Shriver Interrogating a High-Density SNP Map for Signatures of Natural Selection Genome Res., December 1, 2002; 12(12): 1805 - 1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tsitrone, F. Rousset, and P. David Heterosis, Marker Mutational Processes and Population Inbreeding History Genetics, December 1, 2001; 159(4): 1845 - 1859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Beerli and J. Felsenstein Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach PNAS, March 29, 2001; (2001) 81068098. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Kuhner, J. Yamato, and J. Felsenstein Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Recombination Rates From Population Data Genetics, November 1, 2000; 156(3): 1393 - 1401. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Beerli and J. Felsenstein Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach PNAS, April 10, 2001; 98(8): 4563 - 4568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






