The Evolution of Recombination in a Heterogeneous Environment

Corresponding author: Thomas Lenormand, CEFE-CNRS, UPR 9056, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier 05, France., lenormand{at}cefe.cnrs-mop.fr (E-mail)

Communicating editor: J. HEY

Most models describing the evolution of recombination have focused on the case of a single population, implicitly assuming that all individuals are equally likely to mate and that spatial heterogeneity in selection is absent. In these models, the evolution of recombination is driven by linkage disequilibria generated either by epistatic selection or drift. Models based on epistatic selection show that recombination can be favored if epistasis is negative and weak compared to directional selection and if the recombination modifier locus is tightly linked to the selected loci. In this article, we examine the joint effects of spatial heterogeneity in selection and epistasis on the evolution of recombination. In a model with two patches, each subject to different selection regimes, we consider the cases of mutation-selection and migration-selection balance as well as the spread of beneficial alleles. We find that including spatial heterogeneity extends the range of epistasis over which recombination can be favored. Indeed, recombination can be favored without epistasis, with negative and even with positive epistasis depending on environmental circumstances. The selection pressure acting on recombination-modifier loci is often much stronger with spatial heterogeneity, and even loosely linked modifiers and free linkage may evolve. In each case, predicting whether recombination is favored requires knowledge of both the type of environmental heterogeneity and epistasis, as none of these factors alone is sufficient to predict the outcome.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Gandon and S. P. Otto The Evolution of Sex and Recombination in Response to Abiotic or Coevolutionary Fluctuations in Epistasis Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1835 - 1853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Roze and N. H. Barton The Hill-Robertson Effect and the Evolution of Recombination Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1793 - 1811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kirkpatrick and N. Barton Chromosome Inversions, Local Adaptation and Speciation Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 419 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Martin, S. P. Otto, and T. Lenormand Selection for Recombination in Structured Populations Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 593 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Whitaker, D. W. Grogan, and J. W. Taylor Recombination Shapes the Natural Population Structure of the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus islandicus Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2354 - 2361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Roze and T. Lenormand Self-Fertilization and the Evolution of Recombination Genetics, June 1, 2005; 170(2): 841 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Iles, K. Walters, and C. Cannings Recombination Can Evolve in Large Finite Populations Given Selection on Sufficient Loci Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 2249 - 2258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Otto The Advantages of Segregation and the Evolution of Sex Genetics, July 1, 2003; 164(3): 1099 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Lenormand The Evolution of Sex Dimorphism in Recombination Genetics, February 1, 2003; 163(2): 811 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Dumas and J. Britton-Davidian Chromosomal Rearrangements and Evolution of Recombination: Comparison of Chiasma Distribution Patterns in Standard and Robertsonian Populations of the House Mouse Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1355 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. R. Zenger, L. M. McKenzie, and D. W. Cooper The First Comprehensive Genetic Linkage Map of a Marsupial: The Tammar Wallaby (Macropus eugenii) Genetics, September 1, 2002; 162(1): 321 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Agrawal and J. R. Chasnov Recessive Mutations and the Maintenance of Sex in Structured Populations Genetics, June 1, 2001; 158(2): 913 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]