Genetics, Vol. 156, 305-311, September 2000, Copyright © 2000

Is the Genotype-Phenotype Map Modular?: A Statistical Approach Using Mouse Quantitative Trait Loci Data

Jason G. Mezeya, James M. Cheverudb, and Günter P. Wagnera
a Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Center for Computational Ecology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106
b Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

Corresponding author: Günter P. Wagner, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, POB 208106, New Haven, CT 06520-8106., gunter.wagner{at}yale.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: Z-B. ZENG

Various theories about the evolution of complex characters make predictions about the statistical distribution of genetic effects on phenotypic characters, also called the genotype-phenotype map. With the advent of QTL technology, data about these distributions are becoming available. In this article, we propose simple tests for the prediction that functionally integrated characters have a modular genotype-phenotype map. The test is applied to QTL data on the mouse mandible. The results provide statistical support for the notion that the ascending ramus region of the mandible is modularized. A data set comprising the effects of QTL on a more extensive portion of the phenotype is required to determine if the alveolar region of the mandible is also modularized.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. J. Vinyard and B. A. Payseur
Of "mice" and mammals: utilizing classical inbred mice to study the genetic architecture of function and performance in mammals
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 24, 2008; (2008) icn063v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. P. Klingenberg, L. J. Leamy, and J. M. Cheverud
Integration and Modularity of Quantitative Trait Locus Effects on Geometric Shape in the Mouse Mandible
Genetics, April 1, 2004; 166(4): 1909 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. G. Mezey and D. Houle
Comparing G Matrices: Are Common Principal Components Informative?
Genetics, September 1, 2003; 165(1): 411 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
R. C. Albertson, J. T. Streelman, and T. D. Kocher
Genetic Basis of Adaptive Shape Differences in the Cichlid Head
J. Hered., July 1, 2003; 94(4): 291 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Beldade, K. Koops, and P. M. Brakefield
Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings
PNAS, October 29, 2002; 99(22): 14262 - 14267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. J. Murren, N. Pendleton, and M. Pigliucci
Evolution of phenotypic integration in Brassica (Brassicaceae)
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2002; 89(4): 655 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. P. Klingenberg, L. J. Leamy, E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud
Genetic Architecture of Mandible Shape in Mice: Effects of Quantitative Trait Loci Analyzed by Geometric Morphometrics
Genetics, February 1, 2001; 157(2): 785 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text]