Deletion of a Conserved Regulatory Element in the Drosophila Adh Gene Leads to Increased Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity but Also Delays Development

Corresponding author: John Parsch, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Biological Laboratories, 16 Divinity Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138-2020., jparsch{at}oeb.harvard.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: S. YOKOYAMA

In vivo levels of enzymatic activity may be increased through either structural or regulatory changes. Here we use Drosophila melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) in an experimental test for selective differences between these two mechanisms. The well-known ADH-Slow (S)/Fast (F) amino acid replacement leads to a twofold increase in activity by increasing the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme. Disruption of a highly conserved, negative regulatory element in the Adh 3' UTR also leads to a twofold increase in activity, although this is achieved by increasing in vivo Adh mRNA and protein concentrations. These two changes appear to be under different types of selection, with positive selection favoring the amino acid replacement and purifying selection maintaining the 3' UTR sequence. Using transgenic experiments we show that deletion of the conserved 3' UTR element increases adult and larval Adh expression in both the ADH-F and ADH-S genetic backgrounds. However, the 3' UTR deletion also leads to a significant increase in developmental time in both backgrounds. ADH allozyme type has no detectable effect on development. These results demonstrate a negative fitness effect associated with Adh overexpression. This provides a mechanism whereby natural selection can discriminate between alternative pathways of increasing enzymatic activity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. D. Jones and D. J. Begun Parallel evolution of chimeric fusion genes PNAS, August 9, 2005; 102(32): 11373 - 11378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. H. Frey, H. Alakus, J. Wohlschlaeger, K. J. Schmitz, G. Winde, H. G. van Calker, K.-H. Jockel, W. Siffert, and K. W. Schmid GNAS1 T393C Polymorphism and Survival in Patients with Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2005; 11(14): 5071 - 5077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Araki, S. Yoshizumi, N. Inomata, and T. Yamazaki Genetic Coadaptation of the Amylase Gene System in Drosophila melanogaster: Evidence for the Selective Advantage of the Lowest AMY Activity and of Its Epistatic Genetic Background J. Hered., July 1, 2005; 96(4): 388 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Parsch Functional Analysis of Drosophila melanogaster Gene Regulatory Sequences by Transgene Coplacement Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 559 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Baines, J. Parsch, and W. Stephan Pleiotropic Effect of Disrupting a Conserved Sequence Involved in a Long-Range Compensatory Interaction in the Drosophila Adh Gene Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 237 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Duan, M. S. Wainwright, J. M. Comeron, N. Saitou, A. R. Sanders, J. Gelernter, and P. V. Gejman Synonymous mutations in the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) affect mRNA stability and synthesis of the receptor Hum. Mol. Genet., February 1, 2003; 12(3): 205 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]