On the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Spontaneous Mutations

Corresponding author: A. Caballero, Departamento de Bioquímica, Genética e Inmunología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Vigo, 36200 Vigo, Spain., armando{at}uvigo.es (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. G. SHAW

T. Mukai and co-workers in the late 1960s and O. Ohnishi in the 1970s carried out a series of experiments to obtain direct estimates of the average coefficient of dominance (h) of minor viability mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. The results of these experiments, although inconsistent, have been interpreted as indicating slight recessivity of deleterious mutations, with h 0.4. Mukai obtained conflicting results depending on the type of heterozygotes used, some estimates suggesting overdominance and others partial dominance. Ohnishi's estimates, based on the ratio of heterozygous to homozygous viability declines, were more consistent, pointing to the above value. However, we have reanalyzed Ohnishi's data, estimating h by the regression method, and obtained a much smaller estimate of ~0.1. This significant difference can be due partly to the different weighting implicit in the estimates, but we suggest that this is not the only explanation. We propose as a plausible hypothesis that a putative nonmutational decline in viability occurring in the first half of Ohnishi's experiment (affecting both homozygotes and heterozygotes) has biased upward the estimates from the ratio, while it would not bias the regression estimates. This hypothesis also explains the very high h 0.7 observed in Ohnishi's high-viability chromosomes. By constructing a model of spontaneous mutations using parameters in the literature, we investigate the above possibility. The results indicate that a model of few mutations with moderately large effects and h 0.2 is able to explain the observed estimates and the distributions of homozygous and heterozygous viabilities. Accounting for an expression of mutations in genotypes with the balancer chromosome Cy does not alter the conclusions qualitatively.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M. Reynolds, S. Temiyasathit, M. M. Reedy, E. A. Ruedi, J. M. Drnevich, J. Leips, and K. A. Hughes Age Specificity of Inbreeding Load in Drosophila melanogaster and Implications For the Evolution of Late-Life Mortality Plateaus Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 587 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Van Cleve and M. W. Feldman Sex-Specific Viability, Sex Linkage and Dominance in Genomic Imprinting Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 1101 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Shaw and S.-M. Chang Gene Action of New Mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1855 - 1865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero The Effect of Antagonistic Pleiotropy on the Estimation of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 2097 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero Analysis of the Estimators of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 1053 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Charlesworth, H. Borthwick, C. Bartolome, and P. Pignatelli Estimates of the Genomic Mutation Rate for Detrimental Alleles in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, June 1, 2004; 167(2): 815 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Fry On the Rate and Linearity of Viability Declines in Drosophila Mutation-Accumulation Experiments: Genomic Mutation Rates and Synergistic Epistasis Revisited Genetics, February 1, 2004; 166(2): 797 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill Influence of Dominance, Leptokurtosis and Pleiotropy of Deleterious Mutations on Quantitative Genetic Variation at Mutation-Selection Balance Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 597 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Peters, D. L. Halligan, M. C. Whitlock, and P. D. Keightley Dominance and Overdominance of Mildly Deleterious Induced Mutations for Fitness Traits in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, October 1, 2003; 165(2): 589 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Lopez-Fanjul, A. Fernandez, and M. A. Toro The Effect of Neutral Nonadditive Gene Action on the Quantitative Index of Population Divergence Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1627 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Fry and S. V. Nuzhdin Dominance of Mutations Affecting Viability in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1357 - 1364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Whitlock Selection, Load and Inbreeding Depression in a Large Metapopulation Genetics, March 1, 2002; 160(3): 1191 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Chavarrias, C. Lopez-Fanjul, and A. Garcia-Dorado The Rate of Mutation and the Homozygous and Heterozygous Mutational Effects for Competitive Viability: A Long-Term Experiment With Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, June 1, 2001; 158(2): 681 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Agrawal and J. R. Chasnov Recessive Mutations and the Maintenance of Sex in Structured Populations Genetics, June 1, 2001; 158(2): 913 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]