Genetics, Vol. 155, 1981-1990, August 2000, Copyright © 2000

An Inbreeding Model of Associative Overdominance During a Population Bottleneck

Nicolas Biernea, Anne Tsitroneb, and Patrice Davidb
a Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, Station Méditerranéenne de L'Environnement Littoral, 34200 Sète, France
b CEFE-CNRS, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

Corresponding author: Nicolas Bierne, Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, Station Méditerranéenne de l'Environnement Littoral, 1 Quai de la Daurade, 34200 Sète, France., n-bierne{at}univ-montp2.fr (E-mail)

Communicating editor: P. D. KEIGHTLEY

Associative overdominance, the fitness difference between heterozygotes and homozygotes at a neutral locus, is classically described using two categories of models: linkage disequilibrium in small populations or identity disequilibrium in infinite, partially selfing populations. In both cases, only equilibrium situations have been considered. In the present study, associative overdominance is related to the distribution of individual inbreeding levels (i.e., genomic autozygosity). Our model integrates the effects of physical linkage and variation in inbreeding history among individual pedigrees. Hence, linkage and identity disequilibrium, traditionally presented as alternatives, are summarized within a single framework. This allows studying nonequilibrium situations in which both occur simultaneously. The model is applied to the case of an infinite population undergoing a sustained population bottleneck. The effects of bottleneck size, mating system, marker gene diversity, deleterious genomic mutation parameters, and physical linkage are evaluated. Bottlenecks transiently generate much larger associative overdominance than observed in equilibrium finite populations and represent a plausible explanation of empirical results obtained, for instance, in marine species. Moreover, the main origin of associative overdominance is random variation in individual inbreeding whereas physical linkage has little effect.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J HeredHome page
J. M. Aparicio, J. Ortego, and P. J. Cordero
Can a Simple Algebraic Analysis Predict Markers-Genome Heterozygosity Correlations?
J. Hered., January 1, 2007; 98(1): 93 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F. Pernet, R. Tremblay, C. Gionet, and T. Landry
Lipid remodeling in wild and selectively bred hard clams at low temperatures in relation to genetic and physiological parameters
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 209(23): 4663 - 4675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
C. G. Rose, K. T. Paynter, and M. P. Hare
Isolation by Distance in the Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica, in Chesapeake Bay
J. Hered., March 1, 2006; 97(2): 158 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Tsitrone, F. Rousset, and P. David
Heterosis, Marker Mutational Processes and Population Inbreeding History
Genetics, December 1, 2001; 159(4): 1845 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. Launey and D. Hedgecock
High Genetic Load in the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas
Genetics, September 1, 2001; 159(1): 255 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]