Gene Regulatory Networks Generating the Phenomena of Additivity, Dominance and Epistasis

Corresponding author: Stig W. Omholt, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Norway, P.O. Box 5025, 1432 Aas, Norway., stig.omholt{at}ihf.nlh.no (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. H. DAVIS

We show how the phenomena of genetic dominance, overdominance, additivity, and epistasis are generic features of simple diploid gene regulatory networks. These regulatory network models are together sufficiently complex to catch most of the suggested molecular mechanisms responsible for generating dominant mutations. These include reduced gene dosage, expression or protein activity (haploinsufficiency), increased gene dosage, ectopic or temporarily altered mRNA expression, increased or constitutive protein activity, and dominant negative effects. As classical genetics regards the phenomenon of dominance to be generated by intralocus interactions, we have studied two one-locus models, one with a negative autoregulatory feedback loop, and one with a positive autoregulatory feedback loop. To include the phenomena of epistasis and downstream regulatory effects, a model of a three-locus signal transduction network is also analyzed. It is found that genetic dominance as well as overdominance may be an intra- as well as interlocus interaction phenomenon. In the latter case the dominance phenomenon is intimately connected to either feedback-mediated epistasis or downstream-mediated epistasis. It appears that in the intra- as well as the interlocus case there is considerable room for additive gene action, which may explain to some degree the predictive power of quantitative genetic theory, with its emphasis on this type of gene action. Furthermore, the results illuminate and reconcile the prevailing explanations of heterosis, and they support the old conjecture that the phenomenon of dominance may have an evolutionary explanation related to life history strategy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Rajasingh, A. B. Gjuvsland, D. I. Vage, and S. W. Omholt When Parameters in Dynamic Models Become Phenotypes: A Case Study on Flesh Pigmentation in the Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1113 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Veitia Exploring the Molecular Etiology of Dominant-Negative Mutations PLANT CELL, December 1, 2007; 19(12): 3843 - 3851. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B. Gjuvsland, B. J. Hayes, S. W. Omholt, and O. Carlborg Statistical Epistasis Is a Generic Feature of Gene Regulatory Networks Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 411 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Sanjuan and S. F. Elena Epistasis correlates to genomic complexity PNAS, September 26, 2006; 103(39): 14402 - 14405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Phadnis and J. D. Fry Widespread Correlations Between Dominance and Homozygous Effects of Mutations: Implications for Theories of Dominance Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 385 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. C. Bagheri and G. P. Wagner Evolution of Dominance in Metabolic Pathways Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1713 - 1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Veitia Gene Dosage Balance in Cellular Pathways: Implications for Dominance and Gene Duplicability Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 569 - 574. [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Rueppell, T. Pankiw, D. I. Nielsen, M. K. Fondrk, M. Beye, and R. E. Page Jr. The Genetic Architecture of the Behavioral Ontogeny of Foraging in Honeybee Workers Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 1767 - 1779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Gibson, R. Riley-Berger, L. Harshman, A. Kopp, S. Vacha, S. Nuzhdin, and M. Wayne Extensive Sex-Specific Nonadditivity of Gene Expression in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 1791 - 1799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Peccoud, K. V. Velden, D. Podlich, C. Winkler, L. Arthur, and M. Cooper The Selective Values of Alleles in a Molecular Network Model Are Context Dependent Genetics, April 1, 2004; 166(4): 1715 - 1725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Wagner Estimating Coarse Gene Network Structure from Large-Scale Gene Perturbation Data Genome Res., February 1, 2002; 12(2): 309 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Gilchrist and H. F. Nijhout Nonlinear Developmental Processes as Sources of Dominance Genetics, September 1, 2001; 159(1): 423 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]