help button home button Genetics AJP: Gastro and Liver
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cross, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cross, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, K.
Genetics, Vol. 154, 1549-1559, April 2000, Copyright © 2000

Genetic Analysis of the Relationship Between Activation Loop Phosphorylation and Cyclin Binding in the Activation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc28p Cyclin-Dependent Kinase

Frederick R. Crossa and Kristi Levinea
a The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021

Corresponding author: Frederick R. Cross, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., New York, NY 10021., fcross{at}rockvax.rockefeller.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: A. G. HINNEBUSCH

We showed recently that a screen for mutant CDC28 with improved binding to a defective Cln2p G1 cyclin yielded a spectrum of mutations similar to those yielded by a screen for intragenic suppressors of the requirement for activation loop phosphorylation (T169E suppressors). Recombination among these mutations yielded CDC28 mutants that bypassed the G1 cyclin requirement. Here we analyze further the interrelationship between T169E suppression, interaction with defective cyclin, and G1 cyclin bypass. DNA shuffling of mutations from the various screens and recombination onto a T169E-encoding 3' end yielded CDC28 mutants with strong T169E suppression. Some of the strongest T169E suppressors could suppress the defective Cln2p G1 cyclin even while retaining T169E. The strong T169E suppressors did not exhibit bypass of the G1 cyclin requirement but did so when T169E was reverted to T. These results suggested that for these mutants, activation loop phosphorylation and cyclin binding might be alternative means of activation rather than independent requirements for activation (as with wild type). These results suggest mechanistic overlap between the conformational shift induced by cyclin binding and that induced by activation loop phosphorylation. This conclusion was supported by analysis of suppressors of a mutation in the Cdk phosphothreonine-binding pocket created by cyclin binding.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
A. Shimotohno, C. Umeda-Hara, K. Bisova, H. Uchimiya, and M. Umeda
The Plant-Specific Kinase CDKF;1 Is Involved in Activating Phosphorylation of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase-Activating Kinases in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, November 1, 2004; 16(11): 2954 - 2966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Ceccarelli and C. Mann
A Cdc28 Mutant Uncouples G1 Cyclin Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination from G1 Cyclin Proteolysis
J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2001; 276(45): 41725 - 41732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. Miled, C. Mann, and G. Faye
Xbp1-Mediated Repression of CLB Gene Expression Contributes to the Modifications of Yeast Cell Morphology and Cell Cycle Seen during Nitrogen-Limited Growth
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2001; 21(11): 3714 - 3724.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Genetics Society of America.