Effects of Colonization Processes on Genetic Diversity: Differences Between Annual Plants and Tree Species

Corresponding author: Frédéric Austerlitz, Rm. 152, ENRS Bldg., 14 College Farm Rd., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551., austerlitz{at}aesop.rutgers.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. G. SHAW

Tree species are striking for their high within-population diversity and low among-population differentiation for nuclear genes. In contrast, annual plants show much more differentiation for nuclear genes but much less diversity than trees. The usual explanation for this difference is that pollen flow, and therefore gene flow, is much higher for trees. This explanation is problematic because it relies on equilibrium hypotheses. Because trees have very recently recolonized temperate areas, they have experienced many foundation events, which usually reduce within-population diversity and increase differentiation. Only extremely high levels of gene flow could counterbalance these successive founder effects. We develop a model to study the impact of life cycle of forest trees, in particular of the length of their juvenile phase, on genetic diversity and differentiation during the glacial period and the following colonization period. We show that both a reasonably high level of pollen flow and the life-cycle characteristics of trees are needed to explain the observed structure of genetic diversity. We also show that gene flow and life cycle both have an impact on maternally inherited cytoplasmic genes, which are characterized both in trees and annual species by much less diversity and much more differentiation than nuclear genes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L.-J. Hu, K. Uchiyama, H.-L. Shen, Y. Saito, Y. Tsuda, and Y. Ide Nuclear DNA Microsatellites Reveal Genetic Variation but a Lack of Phylogeographical Structure in an Endangered Species, Fraxinus mandshurica, Across North-east China Ann. Bot., August 1, 2008; 102(2): 195 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Dubreuil, M. Riba, and M. Mayol Genetic structure and diversity in Ramonda myconi (Gesneriaceae): effects of historical climate change on a preglacial relict species Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2008; 95(5): 577 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Klopfstein, M. Currat, and L. Excoffier The Fate of Mutations Surfing on the Wave of a Range Expansion Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 482 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. R. Victory, J. C. Glaubitz, O. E. Rhodes Jr, and K. E. Woeste Genetic homogeneity in Juglans nigra (Juglandaceae) at nuclear microsatellites Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2006; 93(1): 118 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Haag, M. Riek, J. W. Hottinger, V. I. Pajunen, and D. Ebert Genetic Diversity and Genetic Differentiation in Daphnia Metapopulations With Subpopulations of Known Age Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1809 - 1820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. MUIR, A. J. LOWE, C. C. FLEMING, and C. VOGL High Nuclear Genetic Diversity, High Levels of Outcrossing and Low Differentiation Among Remnant Populations of Quercus petraea at the Margin of its Range in Ireland Ann. Bot., June 1, 2004; 93(6): 691 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. GAUDEUL and I. TILL-BOTTRAUD Reproductive Ecology of the Endangered Alpine Species Eryngium alpinum L. (Apiaceae): Phenology, Gene Dispersal and Reproductive Success Ann. Bot., June 1, 2004; 93(6): 711 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Petit, I. Aguinagalde, J.-L. de Beaulieu, C. Bittkau, S. Brewer, R. Cheddadi, R. Ennos, S. Fineschi, D. Grivet, M. Lascoux, et al. Glacial Refugia: Hotspots But Not Melting Pots of Genetic Diversity Science, June 6, 2003; 300(5625): 1563 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Castric and L. Bernatchez The Rise and Fall of Isolation by Distance in the Anadromous Brook Charr (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill) Genetics, March 1, 2003; 163(3): 983 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Davis and R. G. Shaw Range Shifts and Adaptive Responses to Quaternary Climate Change Science, April 27, 2001; 292(5517): 673 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text]