Antagonism of Ultraviolet-Light Mutagenesis by the Methyl-Directed Mismatch-Repair System of Escherichia coli

Corresponding author: John B. Hays, Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, ALS 1007, Corvallis, OR 97331-7301., haysj{at}bcc.orst.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: P. L. FOSTER

Previous studies have demonstrated that the Escherichia coli MutHLS mismatch-repair system can process UV-irradiated DNA in vivo and that the human MSH2·MSH6 mismatch-repair protein binds more strongly in vitro to photoproduct/base mismatches than to "matched" photoproducts in DNA. We tested the hypothesis that mismatch repair directed against incorrect bases opposite photoproducts might reduce UV mutagenesis, using two alleles at E. coli lacZ codon 461, which revert, respectively, via CCC CTC and CTT CTC transitions. F' lacZ targets were mated from mut⁺ donors into mutH, mutL, or mutS recipients, once cells were at substantial densities, to minimize spontaneous mutation prior to irradiation. In umu⁺ mut⁺ recipients, a range of UV fluences induced lac⁺ revertant frequencies of 4–25 x 10^-8; these frequencies were consistently 2-fold higher in mutH, mutL, or mutS recipients. Since this effect on mutation frequency was unaltered by an Mfd^- defect, it appears not to involve transcription-coupled excision repair. In mut⁺ umuC122::Tn5 bacteria, UV mutagenesis (at 60 J/m²) was very low, but mutH or mutL or mutS mutations increased reversion of both lacZ alleles roughly 25-fold, to 5–10 x 10^-8. Thus, at UV doses too low to induce SOS functions, such as Umu₂'D, most incorrect bases opposite occasional photoproducts may be removed by mismatch repair, whereas in heavily irradiated (SOS-induced) cells, mismatch repair may only correct some photoproduct/base mismatches, so UV mutagenesis remains substantial.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Park, K. Zhang, Y. Ren, S. Nadji, N. Sinha, J.-S. Taylor, and C. Kang Crystal structure of a DNA decamer containing a cis-syn thymine dimer PNAS, December 10, 2002; 99(25): 15965 - 15970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Negishi, D. Loakes, and R. M. Schaaper Saturation of DNA Mismatch Repair and Error Catastrophe by a Base Analogue in Escherichia coli Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1363 - 1371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Wang and J. B. Hays Mismatch Repair in Human Nuclear Extracts. QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES OF EXCISION OF NICKED CIRCULAR MISMATCHED DNA SUBSTRATES, CONSTRUCTED BY A NEW TECHNIQUE EMPLOYING SYNTHETIC OLIGONUCLEOTIDES J. Biol. Chem., July 12, 2002; 277(29): 26136 - 26142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K.-i. Nara, F. Nagashima, and A. Yasui Highly Elevated Ultraviolet-induced Mutation Frequency in Isolated Chinese Hamster Cell Lines Defective in Nucleotide Excision Repair and Mismatch Repair Proteins Cancer Res., January 1, 2001; 61(1): 50 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. M. Culligan and J. B. Hays Arabidopsis MutS Homologs--AtMSH2, AtMSH3, AtMSH6, and a Novel AtMSH7--Form Three Distinct Protein Heterodimers with Different Specificities for Mismatched DNA PLANT CELL, June 1, 2000; 12(6): 991 - 1002. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. Bebenek, T. Matsuda, C. Masutani, F. Hanaoka, and T. A. Kunkel Proofreading of DNA Polymerase eta -dependent Replication Errors J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2001; 276(4): 2317 - 2320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]