Genetics, Vol. 154, 447-458, January 2000, Copyright © 2000

Effective Population Sizes for Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Genes in a Gynodioecious Species: The Role of the Sex Determination System

Valérie Laportea, Joël Cuguena, and Denis Couvetb
a Laboratoire de Génétique et Evolution des Populations Végétales, UPRESA CNRS 8016, FR CNRS 1818, Université de Lille I, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France
b Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Centre de Recherche de Biologie des Populations d'Oiseaux, 75005 Paris, France

Corresponding author: Valérie Laporte, Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratory, King's Bldgs., W. Mains Rd., Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom., valerie.laporte{at}ed.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. SLATKIN

Equations are derived for the effective sizes of gynodioecious populations with respect to both nuclear and cytoplasmic genes (Nec and Nen, respectively). Compared to hermaphroditism, gynodioecy generally reduces effective population sizes for both kinds of loci to an extent depending on the frequency of females, the sex determination system, and the selfing rate of hermaphrodites. This reduction is due to fitness differences between the sexes and is highly influenced by the mode of inheritance of this fitness. In absence of selfing, nuclear gynodioecy results in a reduction of Nec that depends strongly on the dominance of male sterility alleles, while Nen remains equal to the census number (N). With cytonuclear gynodioecy, both cytoplasmic and nuclear effective sizes are reduced, and at the extreme, dioecy results in the minimum Nec values and either minimum or maximum Nen values (for low or high frequency of females, respectively). When selfing occurs, gynodioecy either increases or decreases Nen as compared to hermaphroditism with the same selfing rate of hermaphrodites. Unexpectedly, Nec also varies with the selfing rate. Thus the genetic sex-determination system appears as a major factor for the nuclear and cytoplasmic genetic diversities of gynodioecious species.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Stadler and L. F. Delph
Ancient mitochondrial haplotypes and evidence for intragenic recombination in a gynodioecious plant
PNAS, September 3, 2002; 99(18): 11730 - 11735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. K. Ingvarsson and D. R. Taylor
Genealogical evidence for epidemics of selfish genes
PNAS, August 20, 2002; 99(17): 11265 - 11269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
V. Laporte, F. Viard, G. Bena, M. Valero, and J. Cuguen
The Spatial Structure of Sexual and Cytonuclear Polymorphism in the Gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: I/ at a Local Scale
Genetics, April 1, 2001; 157(4): 1699 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text]