Population Models of Genomic Imprinting. I. Differential Viability in the Sexes and the Analogy With Genetic Dominance

Corresponding author: Richard J. E. Anderson, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand., richardj.anderson{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz (E-mail)

Communicating editor: A. G. CLARK

Many single-locus, two-allele selection models of genomic imprinting have been shown to reduce formally to one-locus Mendelian models with a modified parameter for genetic dominance. One exception is the model where selection at the imprinted locus affects the sexes differently. We present two models of maternal inactivation with differential viability in the sexes, one with complete inactivation, and the other with a partial penetrance for inactivation. We show that, provided dominance relations at the imprintable locus are the same in both sexes, a globally stable polymorphism exists for a range of viabilities that is independent of the penetrance of imprinting. The conditions for a polymorphism are the same as in previous models with differential viability in the sexes but without imprinting and in a model of the paternal X-inactivation system in marsupials. The model with incomplete inactivation is used to illustrate the analogy between imprinting and dominance by comparing equilibrium bifurcation plots for fixed values of dominance and penetrance. We also derive a single expression for the dominance parameter that leaves the frequency and stability of equilibria unchanged for all levels of inactivation. Although an imprinting model with sex differences does not formally reduce to a nonimprinting scheme, close theoretical parallels clearly exist.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Patten and D. Haig Reciprocally Imprinted Genes and the Response to Selection on One Sex Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1389 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Van Cleve and M. W. Feldman Sex-Specific Viability, Sex Linkage and Dominance in Genomic Imprinting Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 1101 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Day and R. Bonduriansky Intralocus Sexual Conflict Can Drive the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 1537 - 1546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G. Spencer The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Genomic Imprinting Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 411 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Iwasa and A. Pomiankowski The Evolution of X-Linked Genomic Imprinting Genetics, August 1, 2001; 158(4): 1801 - 1809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]