Genetics, Vol. 153, 1775-1787, December 1999, Copyright © 1999

A Comparison of the Genetic Basis of Wing Size Divergence in Three Parallel Body Size Clines of Drosophila melanogaster

A. Stuart Gilchrista and Linda Partridgea
a Department of Biology, Galton Laboratory, University College London, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: A. Stuart Gilchrist, Department of Biology, Galton Laboratory, Wolfson House, University College London, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom., a.gilchrist{at}ucl.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: T. F. C. MACKAY

Body size clines in Drosophila melanogaster have been documented in both Australia and South America, and may exist in Southern Africa. We crossed flies from the northern and southern ends of each of these clines to produce F1, F2, and first backcross generations. Our analysis of generation means for wing area and wing length produced estimates of the additive, dominance, epistatic, and maternal effects underlying divergence within each cline. For both females and males of all three clines, the generation means were adequately described by these parameters, indicating that linkage and higher order interactions did not contribute significantly to wing size divergence. Marked differences were apparent between the clines in the occurrence and magnitude of the significant genetic parameters. No cline was adequately described by a simple additive-dominance model, and significant epistatic and maternal effects occurred in most, but not all, of the clines. Generation variances were also analyzed. Only one cline was described sufficiently by a simple additive variance model, indicating significant epistatic, maternal, or linkage effects in the remaining two clines. The diversity in genetic architecture of the clines suggests that natural selection has produced similar phenotypic divergence by different combinations of gene action and interaction.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. van Heerwaarden, Y. Willi, T. N. Kristensen, and A. A. Hoffmann
Population Bottlenecks Increase Additive Genetic Variance But Do Not Break a Selection Limit in Rain Forest Drosophila
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2135 - 2146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
R. Dukas
Learning affects mate choice in female fruit flies
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2005; 16(4): 800 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. Sezgin, D. D. Duvernell, L. M. Matzkin, Y. Duan, C.-T. Zhu, B. C. Verrelli, and W. F. Eanes
Single-Locus Latitudinal Clines and Their Relationship to Temperate Adaptation in Metabolic Genes and Derived Alleles in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 923 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Palsson and G. Gibson
Association Between Nucleotide Variation in Egfr and Wing Shape in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1187 - 1198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Z. Bochdanovits, H. van der Klis, and G. de Jong
Covariation of Larval Gene Expression and Adult Body Size in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2003; 20(11): 1760 - 1766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. Gockel, W. J. Kennington, A. Hoffmann, D. B. Goldstein, and L. Partridge
Nonclinality of Molecular Variation Implicates Selection in Maintaining a Morphological Cline of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, May 1, 2001; 158(1): 319 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text]