DNA Sequence Variation and the Recombinational Landscape in Drosophila pseudoobscura: A Study of the Second Chromosome

Corresponding author: Martha T. Hamblin, Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, 924 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637., mhamblin{at}genetics.uchicago.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. R. HUDSON

The relationship between rates of recombination and DNA sequence polymorphism was analyzed for the second chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura. We constructed integrated genetic and physical maps of this chromosome using molecular markers at 10 loci spanning most of its physical length. The total length of the map was 128.2 cM, almost twice that of the homologous chromosome arm (3R) in D. melanogaster. There appears to be very little centromeric suppression of recombination, and rates of recombination are quite uniform across most of the chromosome. Levels of sequence variation (_W, based on the number of segregating sites) at seven loci (tropomyosin 1, Rhodopsin 3, Rhodopsin 1, bicoid, Xanthine dehydrogenase, Myosin light chain 1, and ribosomal protein 49) varied from 0.0036 to 0.0167. Generally consistent with earlier studies, the average estimate of _W at total sites is 1.5-fold higher than that in D. melanogaster, while average _W at silent sites is almost 3-fold higher. These estimates of variation were analyzed in the context of a background selection model under the same parameters of mutation rate and selection as have been proposed for D. melanogaster. It is likely that a significant fraction of the higher level of sequence variation in D. pseudoobscura can be explained by differences in regional rates of recombination rather than a larger species-level effective population size. However, the distribution of variation among synonymous, nonsynonymous, and noncoding sites appears to be quite different between the species, making direct comparisons of neutral variation, and hence inferences about effective population size, difficult. Tajima's D statistics for 6 out of the 7 loci surveyed are negative, suggesting that D. pseudoobscura may have experienced a rapid population expansion in the recent past or, alternatively, that slightly deleterious mutations constitute an important component of standing variation in this species.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. D. Singh, A. M. Larracuente, and A. G. Clark Contrasting the Efficacy of Selection on the X and Autosomes in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 454 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. F. Noor, D. A. Garfield, S. W. Schaeffer, and C. A. Machado Divergence Between the Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis Genome Sequences in Relation to Chromosomal Inversions Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1417 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Machado, T. S. Haselkorn, and M. A. F. Noor Evaluation of the Genomic Extent of Effects of Fixed Inversion Differences on Intraspecific Variation and Interspecific Gene Flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1289 - 1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Bartolome, X. Maside, S. Yi, A. L. Grant, and B. Charlesworth Patterns of Selection on Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Variants in Drosophila miranda Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1495 - 1507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Dyer and J. Jaenike Evolutionarily Stable Infection by a Male-Killing Endosymbiont in Drosophila innubila: Molecular Evidence From the Host and Parasite Genomes Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1443 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Scotti-Saintagne, S. Mariette, I. Porth, P. G. Goicoechea, T. Barreneche, C. Bodenes, K. Burg, and A. Kremer Genome Scanning for Interspecific Differentiation Between Two Closely Related Oak Species [Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1615 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Bowers, C. Abbey, S. Anderson, C. Chang, X. Draye, A. H. Hoppe, R. Jessup, C. Lemke, J. Lennington, Z. Li, et al. A High-Density Genetic Recombination Map of Sequence-Tagged Sites for Sorghum, as a Framework for Comparative Structural and Evolutionary Genomics of Tropical Grains and Grasses Genetics, September 1, 2003; 165(1): 367 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Yi, D. Bachtrog, and B. Charlesworth A Survey of Chromosomal and Nucleotide Sequence Variation in Drosophila miranda Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1369 - 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Schaeffer, M. P. Goetting-Minesky, M. Kovacevic, J. R. Peoples, J. L. Graybill, J. M. Miller, K. Kim, J. G. Nelson, and W. W. Anderson Evolutionary genomics of inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura: Evidence for epistasis PNAS, July 8, 2003; 100(14): 8319 - 8324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Comeron and M. Kreitman Population, Evolutionary and Genomic Consequences of Interference Selection Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 389 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Machado, R. M. Kliman, J. A. Markert, and J. Hey Inferring the History of Speciation from Multilocus DNA Sequence Data: The Case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Close Relatives Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2002; 19(4): 472 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. F. Noor, A. L. Cunningham, and J. C. Larkin Consequences of Recombination Rate Variation on Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Studies: Simulations Based on the Drosophila melanogaster Genome Genetics, October 1, 2001; 159(2): 581 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Draye, Y.-R. Lin, X.-y. Qian, J. E. Bowers, G. B. Burow, P. L. Morrell, D. G. Peterson, G. G. Presting, S.-x. Ren, R. A. Wing, et al. Toward Integration of Comparative Genetic, Physical, Diversity, and Cytomolecular Maps for Grasses and Grains, Using the Sorghum Genome as a Foundation Plant Physiology, March 1, 2001; 125(3): 1325 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Kovacevic and S. W. Schaeffer Molecular Population Genetics of X-Linked Genes in Drosophila pseudoobscura Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 155 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. M. Weinreich and D. M. Rand Contrasting Patterns of Nonneutral Evolution in Proteins Encoded in Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genomes Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 385 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. S. Gaut, M. Le Thierry d'Ennequin, A. S. Peek, and M. C. Sawkins Maize as a model for the evolution of plant nuclear genomes PNAS, June 20, 2000; 97(13): 7008 - 7015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]