Molecular Evolution of the Escherichia coli Chromosome. V. Recombination Patterns Among Strains of Diverse Origin

Corresponding author: Roger Milkman, Department of Biological Sciences, 138 Biology Bldg., University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1324., roger-milkman{at}uiowa.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: A. G. CLARK

Incorporation patterns of donor DNA into recipient chromosomes following transduction or conjugation have been studied in the progeny of a variety of Escherichia coli crosses in which donor and recipient nucleotide sequences differ by 1–3%. Series of contiguous or variously spaced PCR fragments have been amplified from each recombinant chromosome and digested with a commercial restriction endonuclease previously shown to distinguish the respective parents in a given fragment. We conclude that entering donor DNA fragments are frequently abridged (cut and shortened) before incorporation, the cutting being due to restriction systems, and the shortening presumably due to exonuclease activity. Analysis of several backcrosses confirms, and extends to conjugation, the importance of restriction in E. coli recombination in nature. The transmission patterns in conjugation are similar to those of transduction, but (as expected) on a much larger scale. Asymmetric results of reciprocal crosses imply that mismatch frequency is not a major factor. Marked differences among the results of simple crosses according to parental strain combinations are consistent with observations that E. coli strains in nature vary dramatically in their restriction-modification systems.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. E. Allen, G. W. Tyson, R. J. Whitaker, J. C. Detter, P. M. Richardson, and J. F. Banfield Genome dynamics in a natural archaeal population PNAS, February 6, 2007; 104(6): 1883 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Robinson and M. C. Enright Evolution of Staphylococcus aureus by Large Chromosomal Replacements J. Bacteriol., February 15, 2004; 186(4): 1060 - 1064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Mruk, M. Cichowicz, and T. Kaczorowski Characterization of the LlaCI methyltransferase from Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris W15 provides new insights into the biology of type II restriction-modification systems Microbiology, November 1, 2003; 149(11): 3331 - 3341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. T. Thomas, W. J. Brammar, and B. M. Wilkins Plasmid R16 ArdA Protein Preferentially Targets Restriction Activity of the Type I Restriction-Modification System EcoKI J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2003; 185(6): 2022 - 2025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Milkman, E. Jaeger, and R. D. McBride Molecular Evolution of the Escherichia coli Chromosome. VI. Two Regions of High Effective Recombination Genetics, February 1, 2003; 163(2): 475 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Bendtsen, A. S. Nilsson, and H. Lehnherr Phylogenetic and Functional Analysis of the Bacteriophage P1 Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein J. Virol., August 28, 2002; 76(19): 9695 - 9701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. E. Murray Immigration control of DNA in bacteria: self versus non-self Microbiology, January 1, 2002; 148(1): 3 - 20. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. F. Dryden, N. E. Murray, and D. N. Rao Nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2001; 29(18): 3728 - 3741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. E. Murray Type I Restriction Systems: Sophisticated Molecular Machines (a Legacy of Bertani and Weigle) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2000; 64(2): 412 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]