The Causes of Synonymous Rate Variation in the Rodent Genome: Can Substitution Rates Be Used to Estimate the Sex Bias in Mutation Rate?

Corresponding author: Nick G. C. Smith, School of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom., n.smith{at}bath.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. R. HUDSON

Miyata et al. have suggested that the male-to-female mutation rate ratio () can be estimated by comparing the neutral substitution rates of X-linked (X), Y-linked (Y), and autosomal (A) genes. Rodent silent site X/A comparisons provide very different estimates from X/Y comparisons. We examine three explanations for this discrepancy: (1) statistical biases and artifacts, (2) nonneutral evolution, and (3) differences in mutation rate per germline replication. By estimating errors and using a variety of methodologies, we tentatively reject explanation 1. Our analyses of patterns of codon usage, synonymous rates, and nonsynonymous rates suggest that silent sites in rodents are evolving neutrally, and we can therefore reject explanation 2. We find both base composition and methylation differences between the different sets of chromosomes, a result consistent with explanation 3, but these differences do not appear to explain the observed discrepancies in estimates of . Our finding of significantly low synonymous substitution rates in genomically imprinted genes suggests a link between hemizygous expression and an adaptive reduction in the mutation rate, which is consistent with explanation 3. Therefore our results provide circumstantial evidence in favor of the hypothesis that the discrepancies in estimates of are due to differences in the mutation rate per germline replication between different parts of the genome. This explanation violates a critical assumption of the method of Miyata et al., and hence we suggest that estimates of , obtained using this method, need to be treated with caution.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Pink, S. K. Swaminathan, I. Dunham, J. Rogers, A. Ward, and L. D. Hurst Evidence That Replication-Associated Mutation Alone Does Not Explain Between-Chromosome Differences In Substitution Rates Gen Biol Evol, June 22, 2009; 2009(0): 13 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ellegren Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation Proc R Soc B, January 7, 2007; 274(1606): 1 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Taylor, S. Tyekucheva, M. Zody, F. Chiaromonte, and K. D. Makova Strong and Weak Male Mutation Bias at Different Sites in the Primate Genomes: Insights from the Human-Chimpanzee Comparison Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 565 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-V. Chamary and L. D. Hurst Similar Rates but Different Modes of Sequence Evolution in Introns and at Exonic Silent Sites in Rodents: Evidence for Selectively Driven Codon Usage Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2004; 21(6): 1014 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Makova, S. Yang, and F. Chiaromonte Insertions and Deletions Are Male Biased Too: A Whole-Genome Analysis in Rodents Genome Res., April 1, 2004; 14(4): 567 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Keightley and D. J. Gaffney Functional constraints and frequency of deleterious mutations in noncoding DNA of rodents PNAS, November 11, 2003; 100(23): 13402 - 13406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Yi, D. L. Ellsworth, and W.-H. Li Slow Molecular Clocks in Old World Monkeys, Apes, and Humans Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2002; 19(12): 2191 - 2198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Wyckoff, J. Li, and C.-I Wu Molecular Evolution of Functional Genes on the Mammalian Y Chromosome Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2002; 19(9): 1633 - 1636. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Filatov and D. Charlesworth Substitution Rates in the X- and Y-Linked Genes of the Plants, Silene latifolia and S. dioica Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2002; 19(6): 898 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-A. Whittle and M. O. Johnston Male-Driven Evolution of Mitochondrial and Chloroplastidial DNA Sequences in Plants Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2002; 19(6): 938 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Bustamante, R. Nielsen, and D. L. Hartl A Maximum Likelihood Method for Analyzing Pseudogene Evolution: Implications for Silent Site Evolution in Humans and Rodents Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2002; 19(1): 110 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Lercher, E. J. B. Williams, and L. D. Hurst Local Similarity in Evolutionary Rates Extends over Whole Chromosomes in Human-Rodent and Mouse-Rat Comparisons: Implications for Understanding the Mechanistic Basis of the Male Mutation Bias Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2001; 18(11): 2032 - 2039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Filatov, V. Laporte, C. Vitte, and D. Charlesworth DNA Diversity in Sex-Linked and Autosomal Genes of the Plant Species Silene latifolia and Silene dioica Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2001; 18(8): 1442 - 1454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. W. Nachman and S. L. Crowell Estimate of the Mutation Rate per Nucleotide in Humans Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 297 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A.-K. Fridolfsson and H. Ellegren Molecular Evolution of the Avian CHD1 Genes on the Z and W Sex Chromosomes Genetics, August 1, 2000; 155(4): 1903 - 1912. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				N. G. C. Smith and L. D. Hurst The Effect of Tandem Substitutions on the Correlation Between Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Rates in Rodents Genetics, November 1, 1999; 153(3): 1395 - 1402. [Abstract] [Full Text]