Genetics, Vol. 152, 345-353, May 1999, Copyright © 1999

The Changes in Genetic and Environmental Variance With Inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster

Michael C. Whitlocka and Kevin Fowlerb
a Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
b Department of Biology, University College, London, NW1 2HE, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: Michael C. Whitlock, Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada., whitlock{at}zoology.ubc.ca (E-mail)

Communicating editor: A. A. HOFFMANN

We performed a large-scale experiment on the effects of inbreeding and population bottlenecks on the additive genetic and environmental variance for morphological traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Fifty-two inbred lines were created from the progeny of single pairs, and 90 parent-offspring families on average were measured in each of these lines for six wing size and shape traits, as well as 1945 families from the outbred population from which the lines were derived. The amount of additive genetic variance has been observed to increase after such population bottlenecks in other studies; in contrast here the mean change in additive genetic variance was in very good agreement with classical additive theory, decreasing proportionally to the inbreeding coefficient of the lines. The residual, probably environmental, variance increased on average after inbreeding. Both components of variance were highly variable among inbred lines, with increases and decreases recorded for both. The variance among lines in the residual variance provides some evidence for a genetic basis of developmental stability. Changes in the phenotypic variance of these traits are largely due to changes in the genetic variance.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X.-S. Zhang
Increase in Quantitative Variation After Exposure to Environmental Stresses and/or Introduction of a Major Mutation: G x E Interaction and Epistasis or Canalization?
Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 687 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. van Heerwaarden, Y. Willi, T. N. Kristensen, and A. A. Hoffmann
Population Bottlenecks Increase Additive Genetic Variance But Do Not Break a Selection Limit in Rain Forest Drosophila
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2135 - 2146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. Waldmann, J. Hallander, F. Hoti, and M. J. Sillanpaa
Efficient Markov Chain Monte Carlo Implementation of Bayesian Analysis of Additive and Dominance Genetic Variances in Noninbred Pedigrees
Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1101 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. D. Weaver, C. C. Roseman, and C. B. Stringer
Close correspondence between quantitative- and molecular-genetic divergence times for Neandertals and modern humans
PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4645 - 4649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. J. Macdonald, T. Pastinen, and A. D. Long
The Effect of Polymorphisms in the Enhancer of split Gene Complex on Bristle Number Variation in a Large Wild-Caught Cohort of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1741 - 1756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. G. Mezey, D. Houle, and S. V. Nuzhdin
Naturally Segregating Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Wing Shape of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2101 - 2113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
I. Dworkin, A. Palsson, and G. Gibson
Replication of an Egfr-Wing Shape Association in a Wild-Caught Cohort of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2115 - 2125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Palsson and G. Gibson
Association Between Nucleotide Variation in Egfr and Wing Shape in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1187 - 1198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill
Redistribution of Gene Frequency and Changes of Genetic Variation Following a Bottleneck in Population Size
Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1475 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill
Influence of Dominance, Leptokurtosis and Pleiotropy of Deleterious Mutations on Quantitative Genetic Variation at Mutation-Selection Balance
Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 597 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Lopez-Fanjul, A. Fernandez, and M. A. Toro
The Effect of Neutral Nonadditive Gene Action on the Quantitative Index of Population Divergence
Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1627 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. C. Phillips, M. C. Whitlock, and K. Fowler
Inbreeding Changes the Shape of the Genetic Covariance Matrix in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, July 1, 2001; 158(3): 1137 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. P. Klingenberg, L. J. Leamy, E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud
Genetic Architecture of Mandible Shape in Mice: Effects of Quantitative Trait Loci Analyzed by Geometric Morphometrics
Genetics, February 1, 2001; 157(2): 785 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. E. B. Kruuk, T. H. Clutton-Brock, J. Slate, J. M. Pemberton, S. Brotherstone, and F. E. Guinness
Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population
PNAS, January 18, 2000; 97(2): 698 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]