Genetics, Vol. 151, 1503-1516, April 1999, Copyright © 1999

Genomic Imprinting and Position-Effect Variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Vett K. Lloyda, Don A. Sinclaira, and Thomas A. Grigliattia
a Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada

Corresponding author: Thomas A. Grigliatti, Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada., grigliat{at}zoology.ubc.ca (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. S. HAWLEY

Genomic imprinting is a phenomenon in which the expression of a gene or chromosomal region depends on the sex of the individual transmitting it. The term imprinting was first coined to describe parent-specific chromosome behavior in the dipteran insect Sciara and has since been described in many organisms, including other insects, plants, fish, and mammals. In this article we describe a mini-X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster that shows genomic imprinting of at least three closely linked genes. The imprinting of these genes is observed as mosaic silencing when the genes are transmitted by the male parent, in contrast to essentially wild-type expression when the same genes are maternally transmitted. We show that the imprint is due to the sex of the parent rather than to a conventional maternal effect, differential mitotic instability of the mini-X chromosome, or an allele-specific effect. Finally, we have examined the effects of classical modifiers of position-effect variegation on the maintenance and the establishment of the imprint. Factors that modify position-effect variegation alter the somatic expression but not the establishment of the imprint. This suggests that chromatin structure is important in maintenance of the imprint, but a separate mechanism may be responsible for its initiation.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. J. Wittkopp, B. K. Haerum, and A. G. Clark
Parent-of-Origin Effects on mRNA Expression in Drosophila melanogaster Not Caused by Genomic Imprinting
Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1817 - 1821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Sha and A. Fire
Imprinting Capacity of Gamete Lineages in Caenorhabditis elegans
Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1633 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. Isidore, H. van Os, S. Andrzejewski, J. Bakker, I. Barrena, G. J. Bryan, B. Caromel, H. van Eck, B. Ghareeb, W. de Jong, et al.
Toward a Marker-Dense Meiotic Map of the Potato Genome: Lessons From Linkage Group I
Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 2107 - 2116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. E. Weisstein and H. G. Spencer
The Evolution of Genomic Imprinting via Variance Minimization: An Evolutionary Genetic Model
Genetics, September 1, 2003; 165(1): 205 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. Lenormand
The Evolution of Sex Dimorphism in Recombination
Genetics, February 1, 2003; 163(2): 811 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. A. Maggert and K. G. Golic
The Y Chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster Exhibits Chromosome-Wide Imprinting
Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1245 - 1258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Belloni, P. Tritto, M. P. Bozzetti, G. Palumbo, and L. G. Robbins
Does Stellate Cause Meiotic Drive in Drosophila melanogaster?
Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1551 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D.-J. de Koning, H. Bovenhuis, and J. A. M. van Arendonk
On the Detection of Imprinted Quantitative Trait Loci in Experimental Crosses of Outbred Species
Genetics, June 1, 2002; 161(2): 931 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. M. Greally, T. A. Gray, J. M. Gabriel, L. q. Song, S. Zemel, and R. D. Nicholls
Conserved characteristics of heterochromatin-forming DNA at the 15q11-q13 imprinting center
PNAS, December 7, 1999; 96(25): 14430 - 14435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]