Telomere Loss in Somatic Cells of Drosophila Causes Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis

Corresponding author: Kent G. Golic, Department of Biology, 201 Biology Bldg., University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112., golic{at}bioscience.utah.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. S. HAWLEY

Checkpoint mechanisms that respond to DNA damage in the mitotic cell cycle are necessary to maintain the fidelity of chromosome transmission. These mechanisms must be able to distinguish the normal telomeres of linear chromosomes from double-strand break damage. However, on several occasions, Drosophila chromosomes that lack their normal telomeric DNA have been recovered, raising the issue of whether Drosophila is able to distinguish telomeric termini from nontelomeric breaks. We used site-specific recombination on a dispensable chromosome to induce the formation of a dicentric chromosome and an acentric, telomere-bearing, chromosome fragment in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. The acentric fragment is lost when cells divide and the dicentric breaks, transmitting a chromosome that has lost a telomere to each daughter cell. In the eye imaginal disc, cells with a newly broken chromosome initially experience mitotic arrest and then undergo apoptosis when cells are induced to divide as the eye differentiates. Therefore, Drosophila cells can detect and respond to a single broken chromosome. It follows that transmissible chromosomes lacking normal telomeric DNA nonetheless must possess functional telomeres. We conclude that Drosophila telomeres can be established and maintained by a mechanism that does not rely on the terminal DNA sequence.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. R. Oikemus, N. McGinnis, J. Queiroz-Machado, H. Tukachinsky, S. Takada, C. E. Sunkel, and M. H. Brodsky Drosophila atm/telomere fusion is required for telomeric localization of HP1 and telomere position effect Genes & Dev., August 1, 2004; 18(15): 1850 - 1861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. Brumwell and V. J. Martin Immunocytochemically Defined Populations of Neurons Progressively Increase in Size Through Embryogenesis of Hydra vulgaris Biol. Bull., August 1, 2002; 203(1): 70 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Donaldson, A. Lui, and G. H. Karpen Modifiers of Terminal Deficiency-Associated Position Effect Variegation in Drosophila Genetics, March 1, 2002; 160(3): 995 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kishi and K. P. Lu A Critical Role for Pin2/TRF1 in ATM-dependent Regulation. INHIBITION OF Pin2/TRF1 FUNCTION COMPLEMENTS TELOMERE SHORTENING, RADIOSENSITIVITY, AND THE G2/M CHECKPOINT DEFECT OF ATAXIA-TELANGIECTASIA CELLS J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2002; 277(9): 7420 - 7429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Mangahas, M. K. Alexander, L. L. Sandell, and V. A. Zakian Repair of Chromosome Ends after Telomere Loss in Saccharomyces Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2001; 12(12): 4078 - 4089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Maggert and G. H. Karpen The Activation of a Neocentromere in Drosophila Requires Proximity to an Endogenous Centromere Genetics, August 1, 2001; 158(4): 1615 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Riha, T. D. McKnight, L. R. Griffing, and D. E. Shippen Living with Genome Instability: Plant Responses to Telomere Dysfunction Science, March 2, 2001; 291(5509): 1797 - 1800. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Basu, H. Bousbaa, E. Logarinho, Z. Li, B. C. Williams, C. Lopes, C. E. Sunkel, and M. L. Goldberg Mutations in the Essential Spindle Checkpoint Gene bub1 Cause Chromosome Missegregation and Fail to Block Apoptosis in Drosophila J. Cell Biol., July 12, 1999; 146(1): 13 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]