Genetics, Vol. 151, 865-884, February 1999, Copyright © 1999

The Reinforcement of Mating Preferences on an Island

Mark Kirkpatricka,b and Maria R. Servedioa
a Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
b Génétique and Environnement, Institute de l'Evolution, Université Montpellier 2, 34095 Montpellier, France

Corresponding author: Mark Kirkpatrick, Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712., kirkp{at}mail.utexas.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. A. ASMUSSEN

We develop a haploid model for the reinforcement of female mating preferences on an island that receives migrants from a continent. We find that preferences will evolve to favor island males under a broad range of conditions: when the average male display trait on the island and continent differ, when the preference acts on that difference, and when there is standing genetic variance for the preference. A difference between the mean display trait on the continent and on the island is sufficient to drive reinforcement of preferences. Additional postzygotic isolation, caused, for example, by either epistatic incompatibility or ecological selection against hybrids, will amplify reinforcement but is not necessary. Under some conditions, the degree of preference reinforcement is a simple function of quantities that can be estimated entirely from phenotypic data. We go on to study how postzygotic isolation caused by epistatic incompatibilities affects reinforcement of the preference. With only one pair of epistatic loci, reinforcement is enhanced by tighter linkage between the preference genes and the genes causing hybrid incompatibility. Reinforcement of the preference is also affected by the number of epistatically interacting genes involved in incompatibility, independent of the overall intensity of selection against hybrids.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J HeredHome page
H. A. Orr, J. Masly, and N. Phadnis
Speciation in Drosophila: From Phenotypes to Molecules
J. Hered., March 1, 2007; 98(2): 103 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. R. Lemmon and M. Kirkpatrick
Reinforcement and the Genetics of Hybrid Incompatibilities
Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 1145 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Kirkpatrick and N. Barton
Chromosome Inversions, Local Adaptation and Speciation
Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 419 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Kirkpatrick, T. Johnson, and N. Barton
General Models of Multilocus Evolution
Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1727 - 1750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. Lenormand and S. P. Otto
The Evolution of Recombination in a Heterogeneous Environment
Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 423 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. E. B. Kruuk, S. J. E. Baird, K. S. Gale, and N. H. Barton
A Comparison of Multilocus Clines Maintained by Environmental Adaptation or by Selection Against Hybrids
Genetics, December 1, 1999; 153(4): 1959 - 1971.
[Abstract] [Full Text]