Genetics, Vol. 151, 459-471, February 1999, Copyright © 1999

Interaction Between the MEC1-Dependent DNA Synthesis Checkpoint and G1 Cyclin Function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Elizabeth A. Vallena and Frederick R. Crossb
a Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania 19081
b The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021

Corresponding author: Elizabeth A. Vallen, Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA 19081., evallen1{at}swarthmore.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: A. P. MITCHELL

The completion of DNA synthesis in yeast is monitored by a checkpoint that requires MEC1 and RAD53. Here we show that deletion of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae G1 cyclins CLN1 and CLN2 suppressed the essential requirement for MEC1 function. Wild-type levels of CLN1 and CLN2, or overexpression of CLN1, CLN2, or CLB5, but not CLN3, killed mec1 strains. We identified RNR1, which encodes a subunit of ribonucleotide reductase, as a high-copy suppressor of the lethality of mec1 GAL1-CLN1. Northern analysis demonstrated that RNR1 expression is reduced by CLN1 or CLN2 overexpression. Because limiting RNR1 expression would be expected to decrease dNTP pools, CLN1 and CLN2 may cause lethality in mec1 strains by causing initiation of DNA replication with inadequate dNTPs. In contrast to mec1 mutants, MEC1 strains with low dNTPs would be able to delay S phase and thereby remain viable. We propose that the essential function for MEC1 may be the same as its checkpoint function during hydroxyurea treatment, namely, to slow S phase when nucleotides are limiting. In a cln1 cln2 background, a prolonged period of expression of genes turned on at the G1-S border, such as RNR1, has been observed. Thus deletion of CLN1 and CLN2 could function similarly to overexpression of RNR1 in suppressing mec1 lethality.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
Y. D. Lee and S. J. Elledge
Control of ribonucleotide reductase localization through an anchoring mechanism involving Wtm1
Genes & Dev., February 1, 2006; 20(3): 334 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. Queralt and J. C. Igual
Functional Distinction Between Cln1p and Cln2p Cyclins in the Control of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mitotic Cycle
Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 129 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Sidorova and L. L. Breeden
Precocious S-Phase Entry in Budding Yeast Prolongs Replicative State and Increases Dependence Upon Rad53 for Viability
Genetics, January 1, 2002; 160(1): 123 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
F. R. Cross, V. Archambault, M. Miller, and M. Klovstad
Testing a Mathematical Model of the Yeast Cell Cycle
Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2002; 13(1): 52 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. D. Jacobson, C. X. Munoz, K. S. Knox, B. E. Williams, L. L. Lu, F. R. Cross, and E. A. Vallen
Mutations in SID2, a Novel Gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cause Synthetic Lethality With sic1 Deletion and May Cause a Defect During S Phase
Genetics, September 1, 2001; 159(1): 17 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
R. J. Craven and T. D. Petes
Involvement of the Checkpoint Protein Mec1p in Silencing of Gene Expression at Telomeres in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2000; 20(7): 2378 - 2384.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. A. Basrai, V. E. Velculescu, K. W. Kinzler, and P. Hieter
NORF5/HUG1 Is a Component of the MEC1-Mediated Checkpoint Response to DNA Damage and Replication Arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 1999; 19(10): 7041 - 7049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]