Genetics, Vol. 150, 911-919, October 1998, Copyright © 1998

Should We Expect Substitution Rate to Depend on Population Size?

Joshua L. Cherrya
a Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-5330

Corresponding author: Joshua L. Cherry, Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, 15 N 2030 E RM 2100, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5330., cherry{at}genetics.utah.edu (E-mail).

Communicating editor: R. R. HUDSON

The rate of nucleotide substitution is generally believed to be a decreasing function of effective population size, at least for nonsynonymous substitutions. This view was originally based on consideration of slightly deleterious mutations with a fixed distribution of selection coefficients. A realistic model must include the occurrence and fixation of some advantageous mutations that compensate for the loss of fitness due to deleterious substitutions. Some such models, such as so-called "fixed" models, also predict a population size effect on substitution rate. An alternative model, presented here, predicts the near absence of a population size effect on substitution rate. This model is based on concave log-fitness functions and a fixed distribution of mutational effects on the selectively important trait. Simulations of an instance of the model confirm the approximate insensitivity of the substitution rate to population size. Although much experimental evidence has been claimed to support the existence of a population size effect, the body of evidence as a whole is equivocal, and much of the evidence that is supposed to demonstrate such an effect would also suggest that it is very small. Perhaps the proposed model applies well to some genes and not so well to others, and genes therefore vary with regard to the population size effect.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Howell, J. L. Elson, D. M. Turnbull, and C. Herrnstadt
African Haplogroup L mtDNA Sequences Show Violations of Clock-like Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1843 - 1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. J. Begun and P. Whitley
Molecular Population Genetics of Xdh and the Evolution of Base Composition in Drosophila
Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 1725 - 1735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. J. Cutler
Understanding the Overdispersed Molecular Clock
Genetics, March 1, 2000; 154(3): 1403 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text]