Genetics, Vol. 150, 755-766, October 1998, Copyright © 1998

Quantitative Genetic Analysis of copia Retrotransposon Activity in Inbred Drosophila melanogaster Lines

Sergey V. Nuzhdina, Elena G. Pasyukovab, Elena A. Morozovab, and Andrew J. Flavellc
a Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616-5755,
b Department of Animal Molecular Genetics, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Russian Academy of Science, Moscow 123182, Russia
c Department of Biochemistry, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: Sergey V. Nuzhdin, Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-5755., svnuzhdin{at}ucdavis.edu (E-mail).

Communicating editor: W. STEPHAN

The rates of transcription and transposition of retrotransposons vary between lines of Drosophila melanogaster. We have studied the genetics of differences in copia retrotransposon activity by quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping. Ninety-eight recombinant inbred lines were constructed from two parental lines exhibiting a 10-fold difference in copia transcript level and a 100-fold difference in transposition rate. The lines were scored for 126 molecular markers, copia transcript level, and rate of copia transposition. Transcript level correlated with copia copy number, and the difference in copia copy number between parental lines accounted for 45.1% of copia transcript-level difference. Most of the remaining difference was accounted for by two transcript-level QTL mapping to cytological positions 27B–30D and 50F–57C on the second chromosome, which accounted for 11.5 and 30.4%, respectively. copia transposition rate was controlled by interacting QTL mapping to the region 27B–48D on the second and 61A–65A and 97D–100A on the third chromosome. The genes controlling copia transcript level are thus not necessarily those involved in controlling copia transposition rate. Segregation of modifying genes, rather than mutations, might explain the variability in copia retrotransposon activity between lines.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Papaceit, V. Avila, M. Aguade, and A. Garcia-Dorado
The Dynamics of the roo Transposable Element In Mutation-Accumulation Lines and Segregating Populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 511 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. S. Dolgin and B. Charlesworth
The Fate of Transposable Elements in Asexual Populations
Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 817 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X. Zhang and T. H. Eickbush
Characterization of Active R2 Retrotransposition in the rDNA Locus of Drosophila simulans
Genetics, May 1, 2005; 170(1): 195 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. Charlesworth, H. Borthwick, C. Bartolome, and P. Pignatelli
Estimates of the Genomic Mutation Rate for Detrimental Alleles in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, June 1, 2004; 167(2): 815 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. A. Petrov, Y. T. Aminetzach, J. C. Davis, D. Bensasson, and A. E. Hirsh
Size Matters: Non-LTR Retrotransposable Elements and Ectopic Recombination in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2003; 20(6): 880 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. D. Fry and S. V. Nuzhdin
Dominance of Mutations Affecting Viability in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1357 - 1364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]