Hidden Effects of X Chromosome Introgressions on Spermatogenesis in Drosophila simulans x D. mauritiana Hybrids Unveiled by Interactions Among Minor Genetic Factors

Corresponding author: Horacio F. Naveira, Departamento de Bioloxía Celular e Molecular, Facultade de Ciencias, Universidade de A Coruña, Campus da Zapateira s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain., horaci{at}udc.es (E-mail).

Communicating editor: C.-I WU

One of the most frequent outcomes of interspecific hybridizations in Drosophila is hybrid male sterility. Genetic dissection of this reproductive barrier has revealed that the number of responsible factors is very high and that these factors are frequently engaged in complex epistatic interactions. Traditionally, research strategies have been based on contrasting introgressions of chromosome segments that produce male sterility with those that allow fertility. Few studies have investigated the phenotypes associated with the boundary between fertility and sterility. In this study, we cointrogressed three different X chromosome segments from Drosophila mauritiana into D. simulans. Hybrid males with these three segments are usually fertile, by conventional fertility assays. However, their spermatogenesis shows a significant slowdown, most manifest at lower temperatures. Each of the three introgressed segments retards the arrival of sperm to the seminal vesicles. Other small disturbances in spermatogenesis are evident, which altogether lead to an overall reduction in the amount of motile sperm in their seminal vesicles. These results suggest that a delay in the timing of spermatogenesis, which might be brought about by the cumulative action of many different factors of minor segment, may be the primary cause of hybrid male sterility.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Barbash Nup96-Dependent Hybrid Lethality Occurs in a Subset of Species From the simulans Clade of Drosophila Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 543 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Moehring, K. C. Teeter, and M. A. F. Noor Genome-Wide Patterns of Expression in Drosophila Pure Species and Hybrid Males. II. Examination of Multiple-Species Hybridizations, Platforms, and Life Cycle Stages Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 137 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. J. Brideau, H. A. Flores, J. Wang, S. Maheshwari, X. Wang, and D. A. Barbash Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science, November 24, 2006; 314(5803): 1292 - 1295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Tao, S. Chen, D. L. Hartl, and C. C. Laurie Genetic Dissection of Hybrid Incompatibilities Between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. I. Differential Accumulation of Hybrid Male Sterility Effects on the X and Autosomes Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1383 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. K. Youngren, J. H. Nadeau, and A. Matin Testicular cancer susceptibility in the 129.MOLF-Chr19 mouse strain: additive effects, gene interactions and epigenetic modifications Hum. Mol. Genet., February 15, 2003; 12(4): 389 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Johnson Sixty Years After "Isolating Mechanisms, Evolution and Temperature": Muller's Legacy Genetics, July 1, 2002; 161(3): 939 - 944. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Barbash, J. Roote, and M. Ashburner The Drosophila melanogaster Hybrid male rescue Gene Causes Inviability in Male and Female Species Hybrids Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1747 - 1771. [Abstract] [Full Text]