Genetics, Vol. 150, 435-447, September 1998, Copyright © 1998

Bottleneck Effect on Genetic Variance: A Theoretical Investigation of the Role of Dominance

Jinliang Wanga, Armando Caballerob, Peter D. Keightleya, and William G. Hilla
a Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Scotland
b Departamento de Bioquímica, Genética e Inmunología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Vigo, 36200 Vigo, Spain

Corresponding author: Jinliang Wang, Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, Ashworth Lab, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Scotland., jinliang.wang{at}ed.ac.uk (E-mail).

Communicating editor: R. G. SHAW

The phenomenon that the genetic variance of fitness components increase following a bottleneck or inbreeding is supported by a growing number of experiments and is explained theoretically by either dominance or epistasis. In this article, diffusion approximations under the infinite sites model are used to quantify the effect of dominance, using data on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. The model is based on mutation parameters from mutation accumulation experiments involving balancer chromosomes (set I) or inbred lines (set II). In essence, set I assumes many mutations of small effect, whereas set II assumes fewer mutations of large effect. Compared to empirical estimates from large outbred populations, set I predicts reasonable genetic variances but too low mean viability. In contrast, set II predicts a reasonable mean viability but a low genetic variance. Both sets of parameters predict the changes in mean viability (depression), additive variance, between-line variance and heritability following bottlenecks generally compatible with empirical results, and these changes are mainly caused by lethals and deleterious mutants of large effect. This article suggests that dominance is the main cause for increased genetic variances for fitness components and fitness-related traits after bottlenecks observed in various experiments.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. van Heerwaarden, Y. Willi, T. N. Kristensen, and A. A. Hoffmann
Population Bottlenecks Increase Additive Genetic Variance But Do Not Break a Selection Limit in Rain Forest Drosophila
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2135 - 2146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. Waldmann, J. Hallander, F. Hoti, and M. J. Sillanpaa
Efficient Markov Chain Monte Carlo Implementation of Bayesian Analysis of Additive and Dominance Genetic Variances in Noninbred Pedigrees
Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1101 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Lopez-Fanjul, A. Fernandez, and M. A. Toro
The Effect of Dominance on the Use of the QST - FST Contrast to Detect Natural Selection on Quantitative Traits
Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 725 - 727.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero
The Effect of Antagonistic Pleiotropy on the Estimation of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations
Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 2097 - 2112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero
Analysis of the Estimators of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations
Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 1053 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill
Redistribution of Gene Frequency and Changes of Genetic Variation Following a Bottleneck in Population Size
Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1475 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill
Influence of Dominance, Leptokurtosis and Pleiotropy of Deleterious Mutations on Quantitative Genetic Variation at Mutation-Selection Balance
Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 597 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. W. Edwards and K. R. Lamkey
Dominance and Genetic Drift: Predicted Effects of Population Subdivision in a Maize Population
Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 2006 - 2017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Lopez-Fanjul, A. Fernandez, and M. A. Toro
The Effect of Neutral Nonadditive Gene Action on the Quantitative Index of Population Divergence
Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1627 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Li, S.-J. Meng, Z.-M. Men, Y.-X. Fu, and Y.-P. Zhang
Genetic Diversity and Population History of Golden Monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana)
Genetics, May 1, 2003; 164(1): 269 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J.-L. Jannink
Selection Dynamics and Limits under Additive x Additive Epistatic Gene Action
Crop Sci., March 1, 2003; 43(2): 489 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. W. Edwards and K. R. Lamkey
Quantitative Genetics of Inbreeding in a Synthetic Maize Population
Crop Sci., July 1, 2002; 42(4): 1094 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]