Canalization, Genetic Assimilation and Preadaptation: A Quantitative Genetic Model

Corresponding author: Carlo Matessi, Istituto di Genetica Biochimica ed Evoluzionistica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Abbiategrasso 207, 27100 Pavia, Italy., matessi{at}ipvgbe.igbe.pv.cnr.it (E-mail).

Communicating editor: M. K. UYENOYAMA

We propose a mathematical model to analyze the evolution of canalization for a trait under stabilizing selection, where each individual in the population is randomly exposed to different environmental conditions, independently of its genotype. Without canalization, our trait (primary phenotype) is affected by both genetic variation and environmental perturbations (morphogenic environment). Selection of the trait depends on individually varying environmental conditions (selecting environment). Assuming no plasticity initially, morphogenic effects are not correlated with the direction of selection in individual environments. Under quite plausible assumptions we show that natural selection favors a system of canalization that tends to repress deviations from the phenotype that is optimal in the most common selecting environment. However, many experimental results, dating back to WADDINGTON and others, indicate that natural canalization systems may fail under extreme environments. While this can be explained as an impossibility of the system to cope with extreme morphogenic pressure, we show that a canalization system that tends to be inactivated in extreme environments is even more advantageous than rigid canalization. Moreover, once this adaptive canalization is established, the resulting evolution of primary phenotype enables substantial preadaptation to permanent environmental changes resembling extreme niches of the previous environment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Masel and H. Maughan Mutations Leading to Loss of Sporulation Ability in Bacillus subtilis Are Sufficiently Frequent to Favor Genetic Canalization Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 453 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Gomez-Mestre and D. R. Buchholz Developmental plasticity mirrors differences among taxa in spadefoot toads linking plasticity and diversity PNAS, December 12, 2006; 103(50): 19021 - 19026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Masel Cryptic Genetic Variation Is Enriched for Potential Adaptations Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1985 - 1991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Masel Evolutionary Capacitance May Be Favored by Natural Selection Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1359 - 1371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. V Badyaev Stress-induced variation in evolution: from behavioural plasticity to genetic assimilation Proc R Soc B, May 7, 2005; 272(1566): 877 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hermisson and G. P. Wagner The Population Genetic Theory of Hidden Variation and Genetic Robustness Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 2271 - 2284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. C. Bagheri and G. P. Wagner Evolution of Dominance in Metabolic Pathways Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1713 - 1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Milton, B. Huynh, P. Batterham, S. L. Rutherford, and A. A. Hoffmann Quantitative trait symmetry independent of Hsp90 buffering: Distinct modes of genetic canalization and developmental stability PNAS, November 11, 2003; 100(23): 13396 - 13401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Siegal and A. Bergman Waddington's canalization revisited: Developmental stability and evolution PNAS, August 6, 2002; 99(16): 10528 - 10532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]