Genetics, Vol. 149, 243-256, May 1998, Copyright © 1998

Multigene Family of Ribosomal DNA in Drosophila melanogaster Reveals Contrasting Patterns of Homogenization for IGS and ITS Spacer Regions: A Possible Mechanism to Resolve This Paradox

Carlos Polancoa, Ana I. Gonzáleza, Álvaro de la Fuentea, and Gabriel A. Dovera
a Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: Gabriel A. Dover, Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK, cgp2{at}le.ac.uk (E-mail).

Communicating editor: R. S. HAWLEY

The multigene family of rDNA in Drosophila reveals high levels of within-species homogeneity and between-species diversity. This pattern of mutation distribution is known as concerted evolution and is considered to be due to a variety of genomic mechanisms of turnover (e.g., unequal crossing over and gene conversion) that underpin the process of molecular drive. The dynamics of spread of mutant repeats through a gene family, and ultimately through a sexual population, depends on the differences in rates of turnover within and between chromosomes. Our extensive molecular analysis of the intergenic spacer (IGS) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) spacer regions within repetitive rDNA units, drawn from the same individuals in 10 natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster collected along a latitudinal cline on the east coast of Australia, indicates a relatively fast rate of X-Y and X-X interchromosomal exchanges of IGS length variants in agreement with a multilineage model of homogenization. In contrast, an X chromosome-restricted 24-bp deletion in the ITS spacers is indicative of the absence of X-Y chromosome exchanges for this region that is part of the same repetitive rDNA units. Hence, a single lineage model of homogenization, coupled to drift and/or selection, seems to be responsible for ITS concerted evolution. A single-stranded exchange mechanism is proposed to resolve this paradox, based on the role of the IGS region in meiotic pairing between X and Y chromosomes in D. melanogaster.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
D. E. Stage and T. H. Eickbush
Sequence variation within the rRNA gene loci of 12 Drosophila species
Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1888 - 1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. H. Eickbush and D. G. Eickbush
Finely Orchestrated Movements: Evolution of the Ribosomal RNA Genes
Genetics, February 1, 2007; 175(2): 477 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
I. Keller, I. C. Chintauan-Marquier, P. Veltsos, and R. A. Nichols
Ribosomal DNA in the Grasshopper Podisma pedestris: Escape From Concerted Evolution
Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 863 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. T. Averbeck and T. H. Eickbush
Monitoring the Mode and Tempo of Concerted Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster rDNA Locus
Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1837 - 1846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y. Okuyama, N. Fujii, M. Wakabayashi, A. Kawakita, M. Ito, M. Watanabe, N. Murakami, and M. Kato
Nonuniform Concerted Evolution and Chloroplast Capture: Heterogeneity of Observed Introgression Patterns in Three Molecular Data Partition Phylogenies of Asian Mitella (Saxifragaceae)
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2005; 22(2): 285 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
E. J. Parkin and R. K. Butlin
Within- and Between-Individual Sequence Variation Among ITS1 Copies in the Meadow Grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus Indicates Frequent Intrachromosomal Gene Conversion
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2004; 21(8): 1595 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. E. Perez-Gonzalez, W. D. Burke, and T. H. Eickbush
R1 and R2 Retrotransposition and Deletion in the rDNA Loci on the X and Y Chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, October 1, 2003; 165(2): 675 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
D. G. Eickbush and T. H. Eickbush
Transcription of Endogenous and Exogenous R2 Elements in the rRNA Gene Locus of Drosophila melanogaster
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2003; 23(11): 3825 - 3836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. E. Perez-Gonzalez and T. H. Eickbush
Rates of R1 and R2 Retrotransposition and Elimination From the rDNA Locus of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, October 1, 2002; 162(2): 799 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. E. Perez-Gonzalez and T. H. Eickbush
Dynamics of R1 and R2 Elements in the rDNA Locus of Drosophila simulans
Genetics, August 1, 2001; 158(4): 1557 - 1567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Briscoe , Jr. and J. E. Tomkiel
Chromosomal Position Effects Reveal Different cis-Acting Requirements for rDNA Transcription and Sex Chromosome Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, July 1, 2000; 155(3): 1195 - 1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Polanco, A. I. González, and G. A. Dover
Patterns of Variation in the Intergenic Spacers of Ribosomal DNA in Drosophila melanogaster Support a Model for Genetic Exchanges During X-Y Pairing
Genetics, July 1, 2000; 155(3): 1221 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text]