Genetics, Vol. 149, 143-155, May 1998, Copyright © 1998

Male Sterility and Meiotic Drive Associated With Sex Chromosome Rearrangements in Drosophila: Role of X-Y Pairing

Bruce D. McKeea,b, Kathy Wilhelma, Cynthia Merrilla, and Xiao-jia Renb
a Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702
b Departments of Zoology, Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996

Corresponding author: Bruce D. McKee, Department of Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Biology, F235 Walters Life Sciences Bldg., University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, bdmckee{at}utk.edu (E-mail).

Communicating editor: M. J. SIMMONS

In Drosophila melanogaster, deletions of the pericentromeric X heterochromatin cause X-Y nondisjunction, reduced male fertility and distorted sperm recovery ratios (meiotic drive) in combination with a normal Y chromosome and interact with Y-autosome translocations (T(Y;A)) to cause complete male sterility. The pericentromeric heterochromatin has been shown to contain the male-specific X-Y meiotic pairing sites, which consist mostly of a 240-bp repeated sequence in the intergenic spacers (IGS) of the rDNA repeats. The experiments in this paper address the relationship between X-Y pairing failure and the meiotic drive and sterility effects of Xh deletions. X-linked insertions either of complete rDNA repeats or of rDNA fragments that contain the IGS were found to suppress X-Y nondisjunction and meiotic drive in Xh-/Y males, and to restore fertility to Xh-/T(Y;A) males for eight of nine tested Y-autosome translocations. rDNA fragments devoid of IGS repeats proved incapable of suppressing either meiotic drive or chromosomal sterility. These results indicate that the various spermatogenic disruptions associated with X heterochromatic deletions are all consequences of X-Y pairing failure. We interpret these findings in terms of a novel model in which misalignment of chromosomes triggers a checkpoint that acts by disabling the spermatids that derive from affected spermatocytes.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Boschi, M. Belloni, and L. G. Robbins
Genetic Evidence That Nonhomologous Disjunction and Meiotic Drive Are Properties of Wild-Type Drosophila melanogaster Male Meiosis
Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 305 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. D. Lorch and L. Chao
Selection for multiple mating in females due to mates that reduce female fitness
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2003; 14(5): 679 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Belloni, P. Tritto, M. P. Bozzetti, G. Palumbo, and L. G. Robbins
Does Stellate Cause Meiotic Drive in Drosophila melanogaster?
Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1551 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. Henikoff, K. Ahmad, and H. S. Malik
The Centromere Paradox: Stable Inheritance with Rapidly Evolving DNA
Science, August 10, 2001; 293(5532): 1098 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Briscoe , Jr. and J. E. Tomkiel
Chromosomal Position Effects Reveal Different cis-Acting Requirements for rDNA Transcription and Sex Chromosome Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, July 1, 2000; 155(3): 1195 - 1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Polanco, A. I. González, and G. A. Dover
Patterns of Variation in the Intergenic Spacers of Ribosomal DNA in Drosophila melanogaster Support a Model for Genetic Exchanges During X-Y Pairing
Genetics, July 1, 2000; 155(3): 1221 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. G. Robbins
Are Unpaired Chromosomes Spermicidal?: A Maximum-Likelihood Analysis of Segregation and Meiotic Drive in Drosophila melanogaster Males Deficient for the Ribosomal-DNA
Genetics, January 1, 1999; 151(1): 251 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text]