- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Deng, H.-W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Deng, H.-W.
Estimating Within-Locus Nonadditive Coefficient and Discriminating Dominance Versus Overdominance as the Genetic Cause of Heterosis
Hong-Wen Dengaa Osteoporosis Research Center, Department of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska 68131
Corresponding author: Hong-Wen Deng, Osteoporosis Research Center, Department of Medicine, Creighton University, 601 N. 30th St., Suite 6787, Omaha, NE 68131, deng{at}creighton.edu (E-mail).
Communicating editor: M. K. UYENOYAMA
) of hi across loci by regression of outcrossed progeny on the sum of the two corresponding homozygous parents. A new approach for estimating
is also developed, utilizing data on families formed by multiple selfed genotypes from each outcrossed parent, thus not requiring constructing homozygotes. Assuming constant mutation effects, h can be estimated accurately by both approaches under dominance. When rare alleles have low frequencies at any polymorphic locus, MUKAI's approach can estimate h accurately under over(under)dominance. Therefore, the (over)dominance hypothesis for heterosis can be tested by estimating h, under either dominance or overdominance at all genomic loci. However, this is invalid with more plausible mixed dominance and overdominance at different loci. Estimating the variance of hi across loci is also investigated. In self-compatible outcrossing populations with mutations of variable effects and lethals, our new approach is better than MUKAI's, not only because of not requiring homozygotes but also because of the better statistical performance reflected by the smaller mean square errors of the estimates.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero The Effect of Antagonistic Pleiotropy on the Estimation of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 2097 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero Analysis of the Estimators of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 1053 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-W. Deng, G. Gao, and J.-L. Li Estimation of Deleterious Genomic Mutation Parameters in Natural Populations by Accounting for Variable Mutation Effects Across Loci Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1487 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li and H.-W. Deng Estimation of Parameters of Deleterious Mutations in Partial Selfing or Partial Outcrossing Populations and in Nonequilibrium Populations Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1893 - 1906. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Willis Inbreeding Load, Average Dominance and the Mutation Rate for Mildly Deleterious Alleles in Mimulus guttatus Genetics, December 1, 1999; 153(4): 1885 - 1898. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. David A Quantitative Model of the Relationship Between Phenotypic Variance and Heterozygosity at Marker Loci Under Partial Selfing Genetics, November 1, 1999; 153(3): 1463 - 1474. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Li, J. Li, and H.-W. Deng The Effect of Overdominance on Characterizing Deleterious Mutations in Large Natural Populations Genetics, February 1, 1999; 151(2): 895 - 913. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H.-W. Deng Characterization of Deleterious Mutations in Outcrossing Populations Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 945 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
