- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by McGill, C. B.
- Articles by Strathern, J. N.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by McGill, C. B.
- Articles by Strathern, J. N.
The Chromosome Bias of Misincorporations During Double-Strand Break Repair Is Not Altered in Mismatch RepairDefective Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Carolyn B. McGilla, Susan L. Holbecka, and Jeffrey N. Strathernaa Gene Regulation and Chromosome Biology Laboratory, National Cancer InstituteFrederick Cancer Research and Development Center, ABLBasic Research Program, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201
Corresponding author: Jeffrey N. Strathern, Gene Regulation and Chromosome Biology Laboratory, NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, ABL-Basic Research Program, Box B, Bldg. 539, Frederick, MD 21702-1201, strather{at}ncifcrf.gov (E-mail).
Recombinational repair of a site-specific, double-strand DNA break (DSB) results in increased reversion frequency for nearby mutations. Although some models for DSB repair predict that newly synthesized DNA will be inherited equally by both the originally broken chromosome and the chromosome that served as a template, the DNA synthesis errors are almost exclusively found on the chromosome that had the original DSB (introduced by the HO endonuclease). To determine whether mismatch repair acts on the template chromosome in a directed fashion to restore mismatches to the initial sequence, these experiments were repeated in mismatch repair-defective (pms1, mlh1, and msh2) backgrounds. The results suggest that mismatch repair is not responsible for the observed bias.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. O. Nowicki, R. Falinski, M. Koptyra, A. Slupianek, T. Stoklosa, E. Gloc, M. Nieborowska-Skorska, J. Blasiak, and T. Skorski BCR/ABL oncogenic kinase promotes unfaithful repair of the reactive oxygen species-dependent DNA double-strand breaks Blood, December 1, 2004; 104(12): 3746 - 3753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Rattray, B. K. Shafer, C. B. McGill, and J. N. Strathern The Roles of REV3 and RAD57 in Double-Strand-Break-Repair-Induced Mutagenesis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1063 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Friedberg, R. Wagner, and M. Radman Specialized DNA Polymerases, Cellular Survival, and the Genesis of Mutations Science, May 31, 2002; 296(5573): 1627 - 1630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Bull, M.-J. Lombardo, and S. M. Rosenberg Stationary-phase mutation in the bacterial chromosome: Recombination protein and DNA polymerase IV dependence PNAS, July 17, 2001; 98(15): 8334 - 8341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Rattray, C. B. McGill, B. K. Shafer, and J. N. Strathern Fidelity of Mitotic Double-Strand-Break Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A Role for SAE2/COM1 Genetics, May 1, 2001; 158(1): 109 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Paques and J. E. Haber Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 1999; 63(2): 349 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





