Genetic Conflicts, Multiple Paternity and the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting

Corresponding author: Andrew G. Clark, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, c92{at}psu.edu (E-mail).

Communicating editor: C.-I WU

We present nine diallelic models of genetic conflict in which one allele is imprintable and the other is not to examine how genomic imprinting may have evolved. Imprinting is presumed to be either maternal (i.e., the maternally derived gene is inactivated) or paternal. Females are assumed to be either completely monogamous or always bigamous, so that we may see any effect of multiple paternity. In contrast to previous verbal and quantitative genetic models, we find that genetic conflicts need not lead to paternal imprinting of growth inhibitors and maternal imprinting of growth enhancers. Indeed, in some of our models—those with strict monogamy—the dynamics of maternal and paternal imprinting are identical. Multiple paternity is not necessary for the evolution of imprinting, and in our models of maternal imprinting, multiple paternity has no effect at all. Nevertheless, multiple paternity favors the evolution of paternal imprinting of growth inhibitors and hinders that of growth enhancers. Hence, any degree of multiple paternity means that growth inhibitors are more likely to be paternally imprinted, and growth enhancers maternally so. In all of our models, stable polymorphism of imprinting status is possible and mean fitness can decrease over time. Neither of these behaviors have been predicted by previous models.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Van Cleve and M. W. Feldman Sex-Specific Viability, Sex Linkage and Dominance in Genomic Imprinting Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 1101 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G. Spencer and A. G. Clark A Chip off the Old Block: A Model for the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting via Selection for Parental Similarity Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 931 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G. Spencer, T. Dorn, and T. LoFaro Population Models of Genomic Imprinting. II. Maternal and Fertility Selection Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2391 - 2398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Mills and T. Moore Polyandry, Life-History Trade-Offs and the Evolution of Imprinting at Mendelian Loci Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 2317 - 2327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G. Spencer, M. W. Feldman, A. G. Clark, and A. E. Weisstein The Effect of Genetic Conflict on Genomic Imprinting and Modification of Expression at a Sex-Linked Locus Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 565 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Weisstein and H. G. Spencer The Evolution of Genomic Imprinting via Variance Minimization: An Evolutionary Genetic Model Genetics, September 1, 2003; 165(1): 205 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Weisstein, M. W. Feldman, and H. G. Spencer Evolutionary Genetic Models of the Ovarian Time Bomb Hypothesis for the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting Genetics, September 1, 2002; 162(1): 425 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. E. Anderson and H. G. Spencer Population Models of Genomic Imprinting. I. Differential Viability in the Sexes and the Analogy With Genetic Dominance Genetics, December 1, 1999; 153(4): 1949 - 1958. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				N. G. C. Smith and L. D. Hurst Molecular Evolution of an Imprinted Gene: Repeatability of Patterns of Evolution Within the Mammalian Insulin-Like Growth Factor Type II Receptor Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 823 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text]