- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Turelli, M.
- Articles by Begun, D. J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Turelli, M.
- Articles by Begun, D. J.
Genetics, Vol 147, 1799-1815, Copyright © 1997
INVESTIGATIONS |
Haldane's Rule and X-chromosome Size in Drosophila
M. Turelli and D. J. Begun
Section of Evolution and Ecology and Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
The ``dominance theory'' of HALDANE's rule postulates that hybrids of the heterogametic sex are more likely to be inviable or sterile than the homogametic sex because some of the epistatic incompatibilities contributing to postzygotic isolation behave as X-linked partial recessives. When this is true, pairs of taxa with relatively large X chromosomes should require less divergence time, on average, to produce HALDANE's rule than pairs with smaller Xs. Similarly, if the dominance theory is correct and if the X chromosome evolves at a similar rate to the autosomes, the size of the X should not influence the rate at which homogametic hybrids become inviable or sterile. We use Drosophila data to examine both of these predictions. As expected under the dominance theory, pairs of taxa with large X chromosomes (~40% of the nuclear genome) show HALDANE's rule for sterility at significantly smaller genetic distances than pairs with smaller X chromosomes (~20% of the genome). As also predicted, the genetic distances between taxa that exhibit female inviability/sterility show no differences between ``large X'' vs. ``small X'' pairs. We present some simple mathematical models to relate these data to the dominance theory and alternative hypotheses involving faster evolution of the X vs. the autosomes and/or faster evolution of incompatibilities that produce male-specific vs. female-specific sterility. Although the data agree qualitatively with the predictions of the dominance theory, they depart significantly from the quantitative predictions of simple models of the dominance theory and the other hypotheses considered. These departures probably stem from the many simplifying assumptions needed to tractably model epistatic incompatibilities and to analyze heterogeneous data from many taxa.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. I. Bolnick, M. Turelli, H. Lopez-Fernandez, P. C. Wainwright, and T. J. Near Accelerated Mitochondrial Evolution and "Darwin's Corollary": Asymmetric Viability of Reciprocal F1 Hybrids in Centrarchid Fishes Genetics, February 1, 2008; 178(2): 1037 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Teeter, B. A. Payseur, L. W. Harris, M. A. Bakewell, L. M. Thibodeau, J. E. O'Brien, J. G. Krenz, M. A. Sans-Fuentes, M. W. Nachman, and P. K. Tucker Genome-wide patterns of gene flow across a house mouse hybrid zone Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 67 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Turelli and L. C. Moyle Asymmetric Postmating Isolation: Darwin's Corollary to Haldane's Rule Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 1059 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Williamson, A. Fledel-Alon, and C. D. Bustamante Population Genetics of Polymorphism and Divergence for Diploid Selection Models With Arbitrary Dominance Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 463 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Torgerson and R. S. Singh Sex-Linked Mammalian Sperm Proteins Evolve Faster Than Autosomal Ones Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2003; 20(10): 1705 - 1709. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Naisbit, C. D. Jiggins, M. Linares, C. Salazar, and J. Mallet Hybrid Sterility, Haldane's Rule and Speciation in Heliconius cydno and H. melpomene Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1517 - 1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Turelli and H. A. Orr Dominance, Epistasis and the Genetics of Postzygotic Isolation Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1663 - 1679. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Barbash, J. Roote, and M. Ashburner The Drosophila melanogaster Hybrid male rescue Gene Causes Inviability in Male and Female Species Hybrids Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1747 - 1771. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Coyne, S. Simeonidis, and P. Rooney Relative Paucity of Genes Causing Inviability in Hybrids Between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Genetics, November 1, 1998; 150(3): 1091 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Presgraves and H. A. Orr Haldane's Rule in Taxa Lacking a Hemizygous X Science, October 30, 1998; 282(5390): 952 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||



