- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Holbeck, S. L.
- Articles by Strathern, J. N.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Holbeck, S. L.
- Articles by Strathern, J. N.
Genetics, Vol 147, 1017-1024, Copyright © 1997
INVESTIGATIONS |
A Role for REV3 in Mutagenesis During Double-Strand Break Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
S. L. Holbeck and J. N. Strathern
Gene Regulation and Chromosome Biology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, ABL-Basic Research Program, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201
Recombinational repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs), traditionally believed to be an error-free DNA repair pathway, was recently shown to increase the frequency of mutations in a nearby interval. The reversion rate of trp1 alleles (either nonsense or frameshift mutations) near an HO-endonuclease cleavage site is increased at least 100-fold among cells that have experienced an HO-mediated DSB. We report here that in strains deleted for rev3 this DSB-associated reversion of a nonsense mutation was greatly decreased. Thus REV3, which encodes a subunit of the translesion DNA polymerase {complex}, was responsible for the majority of these base substitution errors near a DSB. However, rev3 strains showed no decrease in HO-stimulated recombination, implying that another DNA polymerase also functioned in recombinational repair of a DSB. Reversion of trp1 frameshift alleles near a DSB was not reduced in rev3 strains, indicating that another polymerase could act during DSB repair to make these frameshift errors. Analysis of spontaneous reversion in haploid strains suggested that Rev3p had a greater role in making point mutations than in frameshift mutations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Mito, J. V. Mokhnatkin, M. C. Steele, V. L. Buettner, S. S. Sommer, G. M. Manthey, and A. M. Bailis Mutagenic and Recombinagenic Responses to Defective DNA Polymerase {delta} Are Facilitated by the Rev1 Protein in pol3-t Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 1795 - 1806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lee and S. E. Lee Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-Dependent Single-Strand DNA Formation at DNA Break Promotes Microhomology-Mediated End Joining Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2003 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhong, P. Garg, C. M. Stith, S. A. N. McElhinny, G. E. Kissling, P. M. J. Burgers, and T. A. Kunkel The fidelity of DNA synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase zeta alone and with accessory proteins Nucleic Acids Res., October 18, 2006; 34(17): 4731 - 4742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Waters and G. C. Walker The critical mutagenic translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 is highly expressed during G2/M phase rather than S phase PNAS, June 13, 2006; 103(24): 8971 - 8976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Wittschieben, S. C. Reshmi, S. M. Gollin, and R. D. Wood Loss of DNA Polymerase {zeta} Causes Chromosomal Instability in Mammalian Cells Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 134 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-W. Huang, R. Friedman, N. Yu, A. Yu, and W.-H. Li How Strong Is the Mutagenicity of Recombination in Mammals? Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 426 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Wu, X. Lin, T. Okuda, and S. B. Howell DNA Polymerase {zeta} Regulates Cisplatin Cytotoxicity, Mutagenicity, and The Rate of Development of Cisplatin Resistance Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 64(21): 8029 - 8035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Laurencon, C. M. Orme, H. K. Peters, C. L. Boulton, E. K. Vladar, S. A. Langley, E. P. Bakis, D. T. Harris, N. J. Harris, S. M. Wayson, et al. A Large-Scale Screen for Mutagen-Sensitive Loci in Drosophila Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 217 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Machida, K. T.-N. Cheng, V. M.-H. Sung, S. Shimodaira, K. L. Lindsay, A. M. Levine, M.-Y. Lai, and M. M. C. Lai Hepatitis C virus induces a mutator phenotype: Enhanced mutations of immunoglobulin and protooncogenes PNAS, March 23, 2004; 101(12): 4262 - 4267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sakamoto, V. T. T. Lan, Y. Hase, N. Shikazono, T. Matsunaga, and A. Tanaka Disruption of the AtREV3 Gene Causes Hypersensitivity to Ultraviolet B Light and {gamma}-Rays in Arabidopsis: Implication of the Presence of a Translesion Synthesis Mechanism in Plants PLANT CELL, September 1, 2003; 15(9): 2042 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Kozmin, Y. I. Pavlov, T. A. Kunkel, and E. Sage Roles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerases Pol{eta} and Pol{zeta} in response to irradiation by simulated sunlight Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2003; 31(15): 4541 - 4552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. V. Shcherbakova, K. Bebenek, and T. A. Kunkel Functions of Eukaryotic DNA Polymerases Sci. Aging Knowl. Environ., February 26, 2003; 2003(8): re3 - 3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Rattray, B. K. Shafer, C. B. McGill, and J. N. Strathern The Roles of REV3 and RAD57 in Double-Strand-Break-Repair-Induced Mutagenesis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1063 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Friedberg, R. Wagner, and M. Radman Specialized DNA Polymerases, Cellular Survival, and the Genesis of Mutations Science, May 31, 2002; 296(5573): 1627 - 1630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. H. Van Sloun, I. Varlet, E. Sonneveld, J. J. W. A. Boei, R. J. Romeijn, J. C. J. Eeken, and N. De Wind Involvement of Mouse Rev3 in Tolerance of Endogenous and Exogenous DNA Damage Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2002; 22(7): 2159 - 2169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pal, B. Papp, and L. D. Hurst Does the Recombination Rate Affect the Efficiency of Purifying Selection? The Yeast Genome Provides a Partial Answer Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2323 - 2326. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Cejka, V. Vondrejs, and Z. Storchova Dissection of the Functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 Postreplicative Repair Group in Mutagenesis and UV Sensitivity Genetics, November 1, 2001; 159(3): 953 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. I. Pavlov, P. V. Shcherbakova, and T. A. Kunkel In Vivo Consequences of Putative Active Site Mutations in Yeast DNA Polymerases {alpha}, {epsilon}, {delta}, and {zeta} Genetics, September 1, 2001; 159(1): 47 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Bull, M.-J. Lombardo, and S. M. Rosenberg Stationary-phase mutation in the bacterial chromosome: Recombination protein and DNA polymerase IV dependence PNAS, July 17, 2001; 98(15): 8334 - 8341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Diaz, L. K. Verkoczy, M. F. Flajnik, and N. R. Klinman Decreased Frequency of Somatic Hypermutation and Impaired Affinity Maturation but Intact Germinal Center Formation in Mice Expressing Antisense RNA to DNA Polymerase {{zeta}} J. Immunol., July 1, 2001; 167(1): 327 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Rattray, C. B. McGill, B. K. Shafer, and J. N. Strathern Fidelity of Mitotic Double-Strand-Break Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A Role for SAE2/COM1 Genetics, May 1, 2001; 158(1): 109 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. G. Gessler and S. Xu Meiosis and the Evolution of Recombination at Low Mutation Rates Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 449 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Bull, G. J. McKenzie, P. J. Hastings, and S. M. Rosenberg Evidence That Stationary-Phase Hypermutation in the Escherichia coli Chromosome Is Promoted by Recombination Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1427 - 1437. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Murakumo, T. Roth, H. Ishii, D. Rasio, S.-i. Numata, C. M. Croce, and R. Fishel A Human REV7 Homolog That Interacts with the Polymerase zeta Catalytic Subunit hREV3 and the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Protein hMAD2 J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2000; 275(6): 4391 - 4397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Esposito, G. Texido, U. A. K. Betz, H. Gu, W. Muller, U. Klein, and K. Rajewsky Mice reconstituted with DNA polymerase beta -deficient fetal liver cells are able to mount a T cell-dependent immune response and mutate their Ig genes normally PNAS, February 1, 2000; 97(3): 1166 - 1171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Paques and J. E. Haber Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 1999; 63(2): 349 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-J. LOMBARDO, J. TORKELSON, H. J. BULL, G. J. McKENZIE, and S. M. ROSENBERG Mechanisms of Genome-Wide Hypermutation in Stationary Phase Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., May 18, 1999; 870(1): 275 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Diaz, J. Velez, M. Singh, J. Cerny, and M. F. Flajnik Mutational pattern of the nurse shark antigen receptor gene (NAR) is similar to that of mammalian Ig genes and to spontaneous mutations in evolution: the translesion synthesis model of somatic hypermutation Int. Immunol., May 1, 1999; 11(5): 825 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Stambuk and M. Radman Mechanism and Control of Interspecies Recombination in Escherichia coli. I. Mismatch Repair, Methylation, Recombination and Replication Functions Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 533 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. McGill, S. L. Holbeck, and J. N. Strathern The Chromosome Bias of Misincorporations During Double-Strand Break Repair Is Not Altered in Mismatch Repair–Defective Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, April 1, 1998; 148(4): 1525 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||













