- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Cue, D.
- Articles by Feiss, M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Cue, D.
- Articles by Feiss, M.
Genetics, Vol 147, 7-17, Copyright © 1997
INVESTIGATIONS |
Genetic Evidence That Recognition of cosQ, the Signal for Termination of Phage {lambda} DNA Packaging, Depends on the Extent of Head Filling
D. Cue and M. Feiss
Present address: Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St., Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Packaging a phage {lambda} chromosome involves cutting the chromosome from a concatemer and translocating the DNA into a prohead. The cutting site, cos, consists of three subsites: cosN, the nicking site; cosB, a site required for packaging initiation; and cosQ, a site required for termination of packaging. cosB contains three binding sites (R sequences) for gpNu1, the small subunit of terminase. Because cosQ has sequence identity to the R sequences, it has been proposed that cosQ is also recognized by gpNu1. Suppressors of cosB mutations were unable to suppress a cosQ point mutation. Suppressors of a cosQ mutation (cosQ1) were isolated and found to be of three sorts, the first affecting a base pair in cosQ. The second type of cosQ suppression involved increasing the length of the phage chromosome to a length near to the maximum capacity of the head shell. A third class of suppressors were missense mutations in gene B, which encodes the portal protein of the virion. It is speculated that increasing DNA length and altering the portal protein may reduce the rate of translocation, thereby increasing the efficiency of recognition of the mutant cosQ. None of the cosQ suppressors was able to suppress cosB mutations. Because cosQ and cosB mutations are suppressed by very different types of suppressors, it is concluded that cosQ and the R sequences of cosB are recognized by different DNA-binding determinants.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Wieczorek and M. Feiss Genetics of cosQ, the DNA-Packaging Termination Site of Phage {lambda}: Local Suppressors and Methylation Effects Genetics, September 1, 2003; 165(1): 11 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Wieczorek, L. Didion, and M. Feiss Alterations of the Portal Protein, gpB, of Bacteriophage {lambda} Suppress Mutations in cosQ, the Site Required for Termination of DNA Packaging Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 21 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Wieczorek and M. Feiss Defining cosQ, the Site Required for Termination of Bacteriophage {{lambda}} DNA Packaging Genetics, June 1, 2001; 158(2): 495 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. A. Gilakjan and A. M. Kropinski Cloning and Analysis of the Capsid Morphogenesis Genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteriophage D3: Another Example of Protein Chain Mail? J. Bacteriol., December 1, 1999; 181(23): 7221 - 7227. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Arens, Q. Hang, Y. Hwang, B. Tuma, S. Max, and M. Feiss Mutations That Extend the Specificity of the Endonuclease Activity of lambda Terminase J. Bacteriol., January 1, 1999; 181(1): 218 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||

