- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Ehrlich, J.
- Articles by Nadeau, J. H.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Ehrlich, J.
- Articles by Nadeau, J. H.
Genetics, Vol 147, 289-296, Copyright © 1997
INVESTIGATIONS |
Synteny Conservation and Chromosome Rearrangements During Mammalian Evolution
J. Ehrlich, D. Sankoff and J. H. Nadeau
Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7 Canada Present address: Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
An important problem in comparative genome analysis has been defining reliable measures of synteny conservation. The published analytical measures of synteny conservation have limitations. Nonindependence of comparisons, conserved and disrupted syntenies that are as yet unidentified, and redundant rearrangements lead to systematic errors that tend to overestimate the degree of conservation. We recently derived methods to estimate the total number of conserved syntenies within the genome, counting both those that have already been described and those that remain to be discovered. With this method, we show that ~65% of the conserved syntenies have already been identified for humans and mice, that rates of synteny disruption vary ~25-fold among mammalian lineages, and that despite strong selection against reciprocal translocations, inter-chromosome rearrangements occurred approximately fourfold more often than inversions and other intra-chromosome rearrangements, at least for lineages leading to humans and mice.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Bhutkar, S. W. Schaeffer, S. M. Russo, M. Xu, T. F. Smith, and W. M. Gelbart Chromosomal Rearrangement Inferred From Comparisons of 12 Drosophila Genomes Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1657 - 1680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Naruse, M. Tanaka, K. Mita, A. Shima, J. Postlethwait, and H. Mitani A Medaka Gene Map: The Trace of Ancestral Vertebrate Proto-Chromosomes Revealed by Comparative Gene Mapping Genome Res., May 1, 2004; 14(5): 820 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.K. Hartsfield Jr., E.T. Everett, and R.A. Al-Qawasmi GENETIC FACTORS IN EXTERNAL APICAL ROOT RESORPTION AND ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., March 1, 2004; 15(2): 115 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Severson, B. deBruyn, D. D. Lovin, S. E. Brown, D. L. Knudson, and I. Morlais Comparative Genome Analysis of the Yellow Fever Mosquito Aedes aegypti with Drosophila melanogaster and the Malaria Vector Mosquito Anopheles gambiae J. Hered., March 1, 2004; 95(2): 103 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Schaeffer, M. J. Bernhardt, and W. W. Anderson Evolutionary Rearrangement of the Amylase Genomic Regions Between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura J. Hered., November 1, 2003; 94(6): 464 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Eichler and D. Sankoff Structural Dynamics of Eukaryotic Chromosome Evolution Science, August 8, 2003; 301(5634): 793 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lukens, F. Zou, D. Lydiate, I. Parkin, and T. Osborn Comparison of a Brassica oleracea Genetic Map With the Genome of Arabidopsis thaliana Genetics, May 1, 2003; 164(1): 359 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Housworth and J. Postlethwait Measures of Synteny Conservation Between Species Pairs Genetics, September 1, 2002; 162(1): 441 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gonzalez, J. M. Ranz, and A. Ruiz Chromosomal Elements Evolve at Different Rates in the Drosophila Genome Genetics, July 1, 2002; 161(3): 1137 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Coghlan and K. H. Wolfe Fourfold Faster Rate of Genome Rearrangement in Nematodes Than in Drosophila Genome Res., June 1, 2002; 12(6): 857 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Voss, J. J. Smith, D. M. Gardiner, and D. M. Parichy Conserved Vertebrate Chromosome Segments in the Large Salamander Genome Genetics, June 1, 2001; 158(2): 735 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kumar, S. R. Gadagkar, A. Filipski, and X. Gu Determination of the Number of Conserved Chromosomal Segments Between Species Genetics, March 1, 2001; 157(3): 1387 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Ranz, F. Casals, and A. Ruiz How Malleable is the Eukaryotic Genome? Extreme Rate of Chromosomal Rearrangement in the Genus Drosophila Genome Res., February 1, 2001; 11(2): 230 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Gaut Patterns of Chromosomal Duplication in Maize and Their Implications for Comparative Maps of the Grasses Genome Res., January 1, 2001; 11(1): 55 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Postlethwait, I. G. Woods, P. Ngo-Hazelett, Y.-L. Yan, P. D. Kelly, F. Chu, H. Huang, A. Hill-Force, and W. S. Talbot Zebrafish Comparative Genomics and the Origins of Vertebrate Chromosomes Genome Res., December 1, 2000; 10(12): 1890 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Seoighe, N. Federspiel, T. Jones, N. Hansen, V. Bivolarovic, R. Surzycki, R. Tamse, C. Komp, L. Huizar, R. W. Davis, et al. Prevalence of small inversions in yeast gene order evolution PNAS, November 16, 2000; (2000) 240462997. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Schoen Comparative Genomics, Marker Density and Statistical Analysis of Chromosome Rearrangements Genetics, February 1, 2000; 154(2): 943 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Waddington, A. J. Springbett, and D. W. Burt A Chromosome-Based Model for Estimating the Number of Conserved Segments Between Pairs of Species From Comparative Genetic Maps Genetics, January 1, 2000; 154(1): 323 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. O'Brien, M. Menotti-Raymond, W. J. Murphy, W. G. Nash, J. Wienberg, R. Stanyon, N. G. Copeland, N. A. Jenkins, J. E. Womack, and J. A. Marshall Graves The Promise of Comparative Genomics in Mammals Science, October 15, 1999; 286(5439): 458 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
U. Lagercrantz Comparative Mapping Between Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica nigra Indicates That Brassica Genomes Have Evolved Through Extensive Genome Replication Accompanied by Chromosome Fusions and Frequent Rearrangements Genetics, November 1, 1998; 150(3): 1217 - 1228. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Seoighe, N. Federspiel, T. Jones, N. Hansen, V. Bivolarovic, R. Surzycki, R. Tamse, C. Komp, L. Huizar, R. W. Davis, et al. Prevalence of small inversions in yeast gene order evolution PNAS, December 19, 2000; 97(26): 14433 - 14437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





