- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Gubb, D.
- Articles by Ashburner, M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Gubb, D.
- Articles by Ashburner, M.
Genetics, Vol 146, 919-937, Copyright © 1997
INVESTIGATIONS |
Topological Constraints on Transvection Between white Genes Within the Transposing Element TE35B in Drosophila melanogaster
D. Gubb, J. Roote, J. Trenear, D. Coulson and M. Ashburner
Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, United Kingdom
The transposable element TE35B carries two copies of the white (w) gene at 35B1.2 on the second chromosome. These w genes are suppressed in a zeste-1 (z(1)) mutant background in a synapsis-dependent manner. Single-copy derivatives of the original TE35B stock give red eyes when heterozygous, but zeste eyes when homozygous. TE35B derivatives carrying single, double or triple copies of w were crossed to generate flies carrying from two to five ectopic w genes. Within this range, z(1)-mediated suppression is insensitive to copynumber and does not distinguish between w genes that are in cis or in trans. Suppression does not require the juxtaposition of even numbers of w genes, but is extremely sensitive to chromosomal topology. When arranged in a tight cluster, in triple-copy TE derivatives, w genes are nonsuppressible. Breakpoints falling within TE35B and separating two functional w genes act as partial suppressors of z(1). Similarly, breakpoints immediately proximal or distal to both w genes give partial suppression. This transvection-dependent downregulation of w genes may result from mis-activation of the X-chromosome dosage compensation mechanism.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. R. Williams, J. R. Bateman, N. D. Novikov, and C.-T. Wu Disruption of Topoisomerase II Perturbs Pairing in Drosophila Cell Culture Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 31 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Morris, D. A. Petrov, A. M. Lee, and C.-t. Wu Enhancer Choice in Cis and in Trans in Drosophila melanogaster: Role of the Promoter Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 1739 - 1747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Chen, K. L. Huisinga, M. M. Viering, S. A. Ou, C.-t. Wu, and P. K. Geyer Enhancer action in trans is permitted throughout the Drosophila genome PNAS, March 19, 2002; 99(6): 3723 - 3728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Schneider, E. Duperchy, E. Coursange, R. E. Lenski, and M. Blot Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. IX. Characterization of Insertion Sequence-Mediated Mutations and Rearrangements Genetics, October 1, 2000; 156(2): 477 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gubb, C. Green, D. Huen, D. Coulson, G. Johnson, D. Tree, S. Collier, and J. Roote The balance between isoforms of the Prickle LIM domain protein is critical for planar polarity in Drosophila imaginal discs Genes & Dev., September 1, 1999; 13(17): 2315 - 2327. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Morris, J.-l. Chen, S. T. Filandrinos, R. C. Dunn, R. Fisk, P. K. Geyer, and C.-t. Wu An Analysis of Transvection at the yellow Locus of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, February 1, 1999; 151(2): 633 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. S. Rong and K. G. Golic Dominant Defects in Drosophila Eye Pigmentation Resulting From a Euchromatin-Heterochromatin Fusion Gene Genetics, December 1, 1998; 150(4): 1551 - 1566. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Morris, J.-l. Chen, P. K. Geyer, and C.-t. Wu Two modes of transvection: Enhancer action in trans and bypass of a chromatin insulator in cis PNAS, September 1, 1998; 95(18): 10740 - 10745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


