- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by James, A. C.
- Articles by Partridge, L.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by James, A. C.
- Articles by Partridge, L.
Genetics, Vol 146, 881-890, Copyright © 1997
INVESTIGATIONS |
Genetic and Environmental Responses to Temperature of Drosophila melanogaster From a Latitudinal Cline
A. C. James, RBR. Azevedo and L. Partridge
Department of Biology, Galton Laboratory, University College London, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom
Field-collected Drosophila melanogaster from 19 populations in Eastern Australia were measured for body size traits, and the measurements were compared with similar ones on flies from the same populations reared under standard laboratory conditions. Wild caught flies were smaller, and latitudinal trends in size were greater. Reduced size was caused by fewer cells in the wing, and the steeper cline by greater variation in cell area. The reduction in size in field-collected flies may therefore have been caused by reduced nutrition, and the steeper cline may have been caused by an environmental response to latitudinal variation in temperature. No evidence was found for evolution of size traits in response to laboratory culture. The magnitude of phenotypic plasticity in response to temperature of development time, body size, cell size and cell number was examined for six of the populations, to test for latitudinal variation in plasticity. All characters were plastic in response to temperature. Total development time showed no significant latitudinal variation in plasticity, although larval development time showed a marginally significant effect, with most latitudinal variation at intermediate rearing temperatures. Neither thorax length nor wing size and its cellular components showed significant latitudinal variation in plasticity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Paris, F. Geinguenaud, C. Gouyette, J. Liquier, and J. Lacoste Mechanism of Copper Mediated Triple Helix Formation at Neutral pH in Drosophila Satellite Repeats Biophys. J., April 1, 2007; 92(7): 2498 - 2506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Sawyer, F. Sandrelli, C. Pasetto, A. A. Peixoto, E. Rosato, R. Costa, and C. P. Kyriacou The period Gene Thr-Gly Polymorphism in Australian and African Drosophila melanogaster Populations: Implications for Selection Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 465 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. IRIE GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION OF SHELL MORPHOLOGY IN CYPRAEA ANNULUS (GASTROPODA: CYPRAEIDAE) J. Mollus. Stud., February 1, 2006; 72(1): 31 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Fuller, C. F. Baer, and J. Travis How and When Selection Experiments Might Actually be Useful Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2005; 45(3): 391 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. U. Blanckenhorn and M. Demont Bergmann and Converse Bergmann Latitudinal Clines in Arthropods: Two Ends of a Continuum? Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2004; 44(6): 413 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Angilletta Jr., T. D. Steury, and M. W. Sears Temperature, Growth Rate, and Body Size in Ectotherms: Fitting Pieces of a Life-History Puzzle Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2004; 44(6): 498 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gockel, W. J. Kennington, A. Hoffmann, D. B. Goldstein, and L. Partridge Nonclinality of Molecular Variation Implicates Selection in Maintaining a Morphological Cline of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, May 1, 2001; 158(1): 319 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. R. Azevedo and A. M. Leroi A power law for cells PNAS, April 25, 2001; (2001) 91485998. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Zimmerman, A. Palsson, and G. Gibson Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Components of Wing Shape in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, June 1, 2000; 155(2): 671 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Flemming, Z.-Z. Shen, A. Cunha, S. W. Emmons, and A. M. Leroi Somatic polyploidization and cellular proliferation drive body size evolution in nematodes PNAS, May 9, 2000; 97(10): 5285 - 5290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Gilchrist and L. Partridge A Comparison of the Genetic Basis of Wing Size Divergence in Three Parallel Body Size Clines of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, December 1, 1999; 153(4): 1775 - 1787. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. R. Azevedo and A. M. Leroi A power law for cells PNAS, May 8, 2001; 98(10): 5699 - 5704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




