- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Alvarez, G.
- Articles by Zapata, C.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Alvarez, G.
- Articles by Zapata, C.
Genetics, Vol 146, 717-722, Copyright © 1997
INVESTIGATIONS |
Conditions for Protected Inversion Polymorphism Under Supergene Selection
G. Alvarez and C. Zapata
Departamento de Biologia Fundamental, Facultad de Biologia, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Conditions for protected inversion polymorphism under the operation of both karyotype and supergene selection in a viability model have been analytically determined. When supergene selection (the effect of recombination in homokaryotypes lowering the mean fitness of their offspring) is acting on gene arrangements and there is no karyotype selection, it is demonstrated that a polymorphic stable equilibrium is reached by the population, which is a function of only the recombination effects in homokaryotypes. Under both supergene and karyotype selection the degree of dominance (h) of karyotype selection is critical to produce a protected inversion polymorphism. In general, the opportunity for protected polymorphism increases as the degree of dominance decreases. For small s values, the conditions for protected polymorphism are r > 2sh and c > 2s(h - 1), where r and c are the average loss of viability for offspring of ST/ST and IN/IN homokaryotypes, respectively. These findings suggest that supergene selection may be an important balancing mechanism contributing to the maintenance of inversion polymorphism.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kirkpatrick and N. Barton Chromosome Inversions, Local Adaptation and Speciation Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 419 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Alvarez-Castro and G. Alvarez Models of General Frequency-Dependent Selection and Mating-Interaction Effects and the Analysis of Selection Patterns in Drosophila Inversion Polymorphisms Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1167 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Andolfatto and M. Kreitman Molecular Variation at the In(2L)t Proximal Breakpoint Site in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1681 - 1691. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cáceres, A. Barbadilla, and A. Ruiz Recombination Rate Predicts Inversion Size in Diptera Genetics, September 1, 1999; 153(1): 251 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
