- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Lloyd, V. K.
- Articles by Grigliatti, T. A.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Lloyd, V. K.
- Articles by Grigliatti, T. A.
Genetics, Vol 145, 945-959, Copyright © 1997
INVESTIGATIONS |
Competition Between Different Variegating Rearrangements for Limited Heterochromatic Factors in Drosophila melanogaster
V. K. Lloyd, D. A. Sinclair and T. A. Grigliatti
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4 Canada
Position effect variegation (PEV) results from the juxtaposition of a euchromatic gene to heterochromatin. In its new position the gene is inactivated in some cells and not in others. This mosaic expression is consistent with variability in the spread of heterochromatin from cell to cell. As many components of heterochromatin are likely to be produced in limited amounts, the spread of heterochromatin into a normally euchromatic region should be accompanied by a concomitant loss or redistribution of the protein components from other heterochromatic regions. We have shown that this is the case by simultaneously monitoring variegation of a euchromatic and a heterochromatic gene associated with a single chromosome rearrangement. Secondly, if several heterochromatic regions of the genome share limited components of heterochromatin, then some variegating rearrangements should compete for these components. We have examined this hypothesis by testing flies with combinations of two or more different variegating rearrangements. Of the nine combinations of pairs of variegating rearrangements we studied, seven showed nonreciprocal interactions. These results imply that many components of heterochromatin are both shared and present in limited amounts and that they can transfer between chromosomal sites. Consequently, even nonvariegation portions of the genome will be disrupted by re-allocation of heterochromatic proteins associated with PEV. These results have implications for models of PEV.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  B. Grau, C. Popescu, L. Torroja, D. Ortuno-Sahagun, I. Boros, and A. Ferrus Transcriptional Adaptor ADA3 of Drosophila melanogaster Is Required for Histone Modification, Position Effect Variegation, and Transcription Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2008; 28(1): 376 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. S. Belyaeva, L. V. Boldyreva, E. I. Volkova, R. A. Nanayev, A. A. Alekseyenko, and I. F. Zhimulev Effect of the Suppressor of Underreplication (SuUR) Gene on Position-Effect Variegation Silencing in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1209 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Timakov and P. Zhang Genetic Analysis of a Y-Chromosome Region That Induces Triplosterile Phenotypes and Is Essential for Spermatid Individualization in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, May 1, 2000; 155(1): 179 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Mottus, R. E. Sobel, and T. A. Grigliatti Mutational Analysis of a Histone Deacetylase in Drosophila melanogaster: Missense Mutations Suppress Gene Silencing Associated With Position Effect Variegation Genetics, February 1, 2000; 154(2): 657 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. B. Talbert and S. Henikoff A Reexamination of Spreading of Position-Effect Variegation in the white-roughest Region of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, January 1, 2000; 154(1): 259 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. K. Lloyd, D. A. Sinclair, and T. A. Grigliatti Genomic Imprinting and Position-Effect Variegation in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 1999; 151(4): 1503 - 1516. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Singer, A. Kahana, A. J. Wolf, L. L. Meisinger, S. E. Peterson, C. Goggin, M. Mahowald, and D. E. Gottschling Identification of High-Copy Disruptors of Telomeric Silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 613 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Zhang and R. L. Stankiewicz Y-Linked Male Sterile Mutations Induced by P Element in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 735 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. L. Sass and S. Henikoff Comparative Analysis of Position–Effect Variegation Mutations in Drosophila melanogaster Delineates the Targets of Modifiers Genetics, February 1, 1998; 148(2): 733 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|