- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Weber, K. E.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Weber, K. E.
Genetics, Vol 144, 205-213, Copyright © 1996
INVESTIGATIONS |
Large Genetic Change at Small Fitness Cost in Large Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Selected for Wind Tunnel Flight: Rethinking Fitness Surfaces
K. E. Weber
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME 04103
The fitness effects of extreme genetic change by selection were studied in large populations subjected to prolonged, intense selection. Two replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster, with estimated effective sizes 500 <= N(e) <= 1000, were selected for increased performance in a wind tunnel, selecting on average the fastest 4.5% of flies. The mean apparent flying speed of both lines increased from ~2 to 170 cm/sec and continued to respond at diminishing rates, without reaching a plateau, for 100 generations. Competitive fitness tests in generations 50 and 85 showed minimal or no fitness loss in selected lines compared to controls. Sublines relaxed in generations 65 and 85 showed minimal or no regression in apparent flying speed. Hybrid lines, from a cross of selected X control lines in generation 75, responded to reselection saltationally, showing that the chromosomes of the selected lines had been assembled from alleles at many loci, from many different chromosomes in the base population. Thus, major genetic change was achieved, but without the costs usually associated with strong directional selection. Large population size has been interpreted, in opposing models, as either a brake or an accelerator in its effects on long-term change by selection. These results favor the second model, and challenge the concept of rugged fitness surfaces underlying the first model.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  K. E. Weber, R. J. Greenspan, D. R. Chicoine, K. Fiorentino, M. H. Thomas, and T. L. Knight Microarray Analysis of Replicate Populations Selected Against a Wing-Shape Correlation in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, February 1, 2008; 178(2): 1093 - 1108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. R. Swindell and J. L. Bouzat Inbreeding Depression and Male Survivorship in Drosophila: Implications for Senescence Theory Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 317 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. C. Fuller, C. F. Baer, and J. Travis How and When Selection Experiments Might Actually be Useful Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2005; 45(3): 391 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Eldredge, J. N. Thompson, P. M. Brakefield, S. Gavrilets, D. Jablonski, J. B. C. Jackson, R. E. Lenski, B. S. Lieberman, M. A. McPeek, and W. Miller III The dynamics of evolutionary stasis Paleobiology, June 1, 2005; 31(2_Suppl): 133 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. P. Gardner, K. Fowler, N. H. Barton, and L. Partridge Genetic Variation for Total Fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: Complex Yet Replicable Patterns Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1553 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|