- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Palopoli, M. F.
- Articles by Wu, C. I.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Palopoli, M. F.
- Articles by Wu, C. I.
Genetics, Vol 143, 1675-1688, Copyright © 1996
INVESTIGATIONS |
Rapid Evolution of a Coadapted Gene Complex: Evidence From the Segregation Distorter (SD) System of Meiotic Drive in Drosophila melanogaster
M. F. Palopoli and C. I. Wu
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Segregation Distorter (SD) is a system of meiotic drive found in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Males heterozygous for an SD second chromosome and a normal homologue (SD(+)) produce predominantly SD-bearing sperm. The coadapted gene complex responsible for this transmission advantage spans the second chromosome centromere, consisting of three major and several minor interacting loci. To investigate the evolutionary history of this system, we surveyed levels of polymorphism and divergence at six genes that together encompass this pericentromeric region and span seven map units. Interestingly, there was no discernible divergence between SD and SD(+) chromosomes for any of these molecular markers. Furthermore, SD chromosomes harbored much less polymorphism than did SD(+) chromosomes. The results suggest that the SD system evolved recently, swept to appreciable frequencies worldwide, and carried with it the entire second chromosome centromeric region (roughly 10% of the genome). Despite its well-documented genetic complexity, this coadapted system appears to have evolved on a time scale that is much shorter than can be gauged using nucleotide substitution data. Finally, the large genomic region hitchhiking with SD indicates that a multilocus, epistatically selected system could affect the levels of DNA polymorphism observed in regions of reduced recombination.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Derome, E. Baudry, D. Ogereau, M. Veuille, and C. Montchamp-Moreau Selective Sweeps in a 2-Locus Model for Sex-Ratio Meiotic Drive in Drosophila simulans Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 409 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Dyer, B. Charlesworth, and J. Jaenike Chromosome-wide linkage disequilibrium as a consequence of meiotic drive PNAS, January 30, 2007; 104(5): 1587 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Mroczek, J. R. Melo, A. C. Luce, E. N. Hiatt, and R. K. Dawe The Maize Ab10 Meiotic Drive System Maps to Supernumerary Sequences in a Large Complex Haplotype Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 145 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. CHA, D. D. CHADEE, and D. W. SEVERSON Population dynamics of an endogenous meiotic drive system in aedes aegypti in trinidad. Am J Trop Med Hyg, July 1, 2006; 75(1): 70 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-M. Chevin and F. Hospital The Hitchhiking Effect of an Autosomal Meiotic Drive Gene Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1829 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. CHA, A. MORI, D. D. CHADEE, and D. W. SEVERSON CAGE TRIALS USING AN ENDOGENOUS MEIOTIC DRIVE GENE IN THE MOSQUITO AEDES AEGYPTI TO PROMOTE POPULATION REPLACEMENT Am J Trop Med Hyg, January 1, 2006; 74(1): 62 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Wilkinson, E. G. Amitin, and P. M. Johns Sex-linked Correlated Responses in Female Reproductive Traits to Selection on Male Eye Span in Stalk-eyed Flies Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2005; 45(3): 500 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Hall and J. H. Willis Transmission Ratio Distortion in Intraspecific Hybrids of Mimulus guttatus: Implications for Genomic Divergence Genetics, May 1, 2005; 170(1): 375 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Derome, K. Metayer, C. Montchamp-Moreau, and M. Veuille Signature of Selective Sweep Associated With the Evolution of sex-ratio Drive in Drosophila simulans Genetics, March 1, 2004; 166(3): 1357 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gorelick and M. D. Laubichler Decomposing Multilocus Linkage Disequilibrium Genetics, March 1, 2004; 166(3): 1581 - 1583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Graustein, J. M. Gaspar, J. R. Walters, and M. F. Palopoli Levels of DNA Polymorphism Vary With Mating System in the Nematode Genus Caenorhabditis Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 99 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Harushima, M. Nakagahra, M. Yano, T. Sasaki, and N. Kurata Diverse Variation of Reproductive Barriers in Three Intraspecific Rice Crosses Genetics, January 1, 2002; 160(1): 313 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Andolfatto and M. Przeworski A Genome-Wide Departure From the Standard Neutral Model in Natural Populations of Drosophila Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 257 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||




